According to sociologist, getting help from the people is a social right of beggars. People usually beg when they are helpless or unable to earn money with onerous jobs. General people help them too from the point of humanity and it has become a long term tradition in society. For the justification of right or wrong in giving money to beggars, i would like to stand in support of that.
People could have lived separately and far away from home in a jungle or in a clam place. But they seems to live together because of mutual benefits. When people started society by living closely it was the main motivation behind and they felt that united we stand divided we fall. Because at that time the world was more dangerous than today and it was difficult to survive without staying together. So, helping each other in the time of their needs with food or money has been a core factor of society establishment. When we see people without food, water or cloth, it is our human instinct and basic rules of society which makes us quiet bound to feel sympathy for them and contribute some help to their betterment of life. Suppose, if people refuses to help others who are helpless, then there will be violation of rules in society. Because when helpless people will not get the basic help their survival instinct will make them to do heinous jobs leaving behind the morality. So it is better to maintain a balance in society by helping them.
Moreover, we are human species, considered as the best creation on the earth. We are different form the wild animals of the jungle and must possess some extra ordinary quality. I think, humanity is one of them. Human beings are more kind and careful for all the species on earth. For beggars, they have responsibility to make them uplift in society by creating working opportunity for them or helping them with basic needs. If humanity were gone from human being the world could have never been a better place.
People should come forward for helpless beggars for the sake of humanity and social order. But their are cheaters and lazy peoples who have capability of working but they like to beg just because it is easy to get people's sympathy by faking their pains. People should be aware and selective to find out who really need help and help them as much as they can. That is how we can keep a balance in society by integrating them in the main stream.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 347, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ht or wrong in giving money to beggars, i would like to stand in support of that....
^
Line 3, column 100, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'seem'
Suggestion: seem
...n a jungle or in a clam place. But they seems to live together because of mutual bene...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 838, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... will be violation of rules in society. Because when helpless people will not get the b...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 425, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... them or helping them with basic needs. If humanity were gone from human being the...
^^
Line 7, column 96, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
... sake of humanity and social order. But their are cheaters and lazy peoples who have ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, really, so, then, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1973.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 429.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59906759907 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31699990145 2.67179642975 87% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496503496503 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 619.2 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5547987018 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.7826086957 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.652173913 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.91304347826 5.45110844103 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14927048419 0.236089414692 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0466720886478 0.076458572812 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0450631827107 0.0737576698707 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100288995743 0.150856017488 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0473381005751 0.0645574589148 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.