Some people suggest that it is wrong to give money to beggars asking for money on the street, while others think that it is the right thing to do. Which point of view do you think is correct, and why?
While some people believe that it is right to give money to beggars asking for money on the street, most of the people think that it is the wrong thing to do. I believe that it is wrong to give money to beggars asking for money on the street.
One of the chief reasons for my view is that the money you give to the beggar sometimes goes to thieves who make these beggars beg for money and collect money for the thieves. For instance, these thieves threaten the beggars and don't give even a significant share of money to the beggars. This leads to oppression of the beggars.
Another reason for my view is that giving money to beggars encourages begging. For instance, if we give money to people who beg, they think that it is easy money. So, instead of attempting to work and earn their money by doing some jobs even menial ones, they stick to begging and become lazy. This is also harmful to the GNP as the beggars do not contribute to GNP. Instead, if they had worked even as a servant or car cleaner or waiter, they might earn money and contribute to the GNP.
Some might argue that it is our moral responsibility to help the poor. Yet we know that instead of giving money, if we give them proper education, that would be far more benefetial as they would be capable of earning their own money. Proper education would also help them make more rational decisions on spending money. Many a times they waste the money on alcohol and other harmful stuff. If they are going to spend money on illegal activities, why should we pay?
For all the reasons above, I believe that giving money to beggars asking for money is the wrong thing to do.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | Md Lutfor Rahman | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | prayashpathak | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | Chayank_11 | 70 | view |
| 2019-11-12 | m.h_ghasempourabadi | 71 | view |
| 2019-11-09 | ch14b18m000002 | 60 | view |
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain. 50
- Claim: In any field — business, politics, education, government — those in power should step down after five years.Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership. 66
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain. 50
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts. 50
- Today it is clear that our increasing use of technology has caused more harm than good for mankind. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 230, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... these thieves threaten the beggars and dont give even a significant share of money ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 326, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a time' or simply 'times'?
Suggestion: a time; times
...ional decisions on spending money. Many a times they waste the money on alcohol and oth...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 52.1666666667 65% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1346.0 1977.66487455 68% => OK
No of words: 305.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.4131147541 4.8611393121 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.16706182354 2.67179642975 81% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 212.727598566 64% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.445901639344 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 414.0 618.680645161 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.5220247821 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.125 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0625 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.375 5.45110844103 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.486546957454 0.236089414692 206% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.189056294135 0.076458572812 247% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.170208311358 0.0737576698707 231% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.338474832125 0.150856017488 224% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.163695159557 0.0645574589148 254% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 11.7677419355 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.3 10.9000537634 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.86 8.01818996416 86% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 86.8835125448 51% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.