There were times in history where people became beggers because of poverty and unavailability of survival resources. Over the period, the situation has been changed and begging has become a kind of business in an illegit way. I would suggest not to help beggers who asks for money on the street. I feel this way for several reasons.
To begin with, begging has become as business to some people who hires adults and children to beg on the streets. This illegit way of earning money is unacceptible in two ways. First, poor children and adults are forced by illegit business people to do begging and collecting money by creating sympathy. Second, children are hurt and made as physically disabled to attract people's attention. As real example, there are many such serious cases has happened in India. This type of cruel approach has been developed as illegal business on the basis of common people's tendency of money giving to beggers.
In addition, new born babies are also being used in this begging business to trigger people's sympathy towards giving money to beggers. Babies are nothing but stolen from various places. In India, there are many local crimes has been registered regarding new born babies missing. This kind of cruel network benefits from people's emotions towards beggers with disabilities and babies. Though severe government actions are needed to solve this problem, people can do their part by not encouraging these activities.
Finally, apart from people who were forced to beg for business, there are some people who starts begging because of their poverty and for survival. Ignoring beggers completely is gonna affect those people who are really in need of help. So, people can help them by buying foods and cloths, and basic necessities. By doing so, we can maintain humanity and also indirectly protecting people being forced in begging business.
- Claim: Even though young people often receive the advice to “follow your dreams,” more emphasis should be placed on picking worthy goals. Reason: Many people’s dreams are inherently selfish.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which 58
- American literature of the early 20th century saw the rise of a number of influential authors writing in a new style. Ernest Hemingway, F. Scott Fitzgerald, E.E. Cummings, and Ezra Pound, among many others, left an undeniably deep impact on how we write, 3
- As we acquire more knowledge, things do not become more comprehensible, but more complex and mysterious. 62
- Some people suggest that it is wrong to give money to beggars asking for money on the street, while others think that it is the right thing to do. Which point of view do you think is correct, and why? 90
- "The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition." - Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or dis 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 557, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...illegal business on the basis of common peoples tendency of money giving to beggers. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 295, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...lp them by buying foods and cloths, and basic necessities. By doing so, we can maintain humanity ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, really, regarding, second, so, apart from, i feel, in addition, kind of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 43.0788530466 32% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1572.0 1977.66487455 79% => OK
No of words: 309.0 407.700716846 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08737864078 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44570281932 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 212.727598566 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533980582524 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.0529541876 48.9658058833 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.7368421053 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2631578947 20.6045352989 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94736842105 5.45110844103 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 11.8709677419 25% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.85842293907 285% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178668807206 0.236089414692 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.05873845515 0.076458572812 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0560720343758 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114888941239 0.150856017488 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0210119737637 0.0645574589148 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.