Many of us at least once in our life-time face the issue whether it is better to build industry and houses, or saving the land for endangered animals, which one would be more satisfying for us? Although some people prefer to save the land for endangered animals, I would definitely take a step back and choose to build industries and farmland. The reason for which my prospect is based on will be discussed in detail below.
First and foremost, Building industries will provide a steady flow of working opportunity. The concept of observe animals is a cornerstone of today's society. In fact, we need this type of knowledge to sustain our life and without it we couldn't survive in contemporary realities. Furthermore, man of the working adults have families which depend on them and rely on their jobs.
Secondly, as the old saying goes "no risk, no reward". Because successes often times accompany risks. Building industries usually more risks than saving the land for endangered animals. Take myself for example, when I graduated from the university for a master's degree without any risks. The second was to study abroad without knowing which university would admit me. It seemed like a gamble because it was possible that none of the university would accept me. Wanting a better future, I chose to travel abroad, and doing so, I succeeded in getting admitted. Therefore, taking something with risk will often give more reward.
Lastly, from psychological aspects, working inside industries should contribute in building the person. As for society, preventing anyone from working there in any area and ignoring them in their most crucial conjuncture of life, will cause many problems. This notion may cause other problems such as depression, alienation and also ruin their self confidence. I personally believe, this is not good for the development of the society in the future, due to the fact that, That self confidence and positive thinking are the chief motivators of societies.
To summarize, the real situation necessitate wisdom to thoroughly weigh the pros and cons before jumping to saving the land for animals. As discussed above, I can safely come to the conclusion that building industries is safer in making sure there is a high chance of success. It's more favorable since it is the most effective way in ensuring a higher success rate and will save people from undue trouble as well as assist them to prospect future.
- Is it better to enjoy your money when you earn it or it is better to save for some time in the future? 90
- TPO-01 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay inorder to do so. A mandatory policy requiri 80
- Some people prefer to work for a large company. Other prefer to work for a small company. Which would you prefer? Use specific reasons and details to support your choice. 90
- TPO-16 - Integrated Writing Task The United Kingdom (sometimes referred to as Britain) has a long and rich history of human settlement. Traces of buildings, tools, and art can be found from periods going back many thousands of years: from the Stone Age, t 81
- TPO-16 - Integrated Writing Task The United Kingdom (sometimes referred to as Britain) has a long and rich history of human settlement. Traces of buildings, tools, and art can be found from periods going back many thousands of years: from the Stone Age, t 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 237, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...e to sustain our life and without it we couldnt survive in contemporary realities. Furt...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, as for, as to, at least, for example, in fact, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2050.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 405.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06172839506 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68824602049 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58024691358 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 646.2 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4489526267 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.1818181818 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4090909091 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.95454545455 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335289010552 0.236089414692 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0859809813239 0.076458572812 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125195075681 0.0737576698707 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169686319609 0.150856017488 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116623504885 0.0645574589148 181% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.