Some people think that human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals. Do you agree or disagree with this point of view? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
As human population is increasing dramatically day by day, requirements of mankind are increasing too. We need more food, occupation, technologies to live and improve further. As a result people need more land areas to satisfy their requirements. In my point of view, I disagree with those people who think that human needs are more important than those animals facing extinctions. I feel this way for two main reasons including mankind is not the only species on the earth and every creatures on the earth have an equal rights and have its own role in order to keep the balance of this planet.
First and foremost, aforementioned we are not the only organisms on this planet and we have to share the land for every species especially with those endangered animals such as, Panda, Tasmania and Orangutan. The green planet has thousands of species and all of them have an equal share to live here freely. If people use all of the lands only for our requirement to live in today’s society, it would be act of unfairness and discrimination. As a result, surviving in this harsh reality will be impossible for some species. To conclude, we have to respect and give them to evolve by following the natural law.
Secondly, every species including human being, insects, animals, and plants have their own precious space that cannot be replaced by any other species and they has their own influence that remains the earth unique. Assume that, if one species of insects like round worm would disappear completely then the animals that hunt them for example, birds cannot survive and it would likely to have an impact on other animals that relates with birds. Furthermore, if mankind keep stealing land and doing harmful things to another species in order to satisfy themselves, we might face our karma which can be represented as famine, natural phenomenon, and fatal disease than can be created by the extinction of one species as a result.
To conclude, I believe that there should be place to live for animals especially animals at risk such as Panda, Tasmania from Australia, Orangutan, and African hyenas. Human beings have to be respectful for every organism because everything on the earth created with their own meaning. Also, animals, people, insects and plants are the factors to maintain sustainable life on the earth.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | Dimitrina | 60 | view |
| 2019-12-21 | Manu2525 | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | bishoy | 76 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | MOHD ARAFAT | 76 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | MOHD ARAFAT | 76 | view |
- In some countries teenager have jobs while they are still students. Do you think it is a good idea? Support your opinion by specific reasons and details to support your answer. 3
- Some people think that human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals. Do you agree or disagree with this point of view? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- When people succeed it is because of hard work Luck has nothing to do with success Do you agree or disagree with the quotation above Use specific reasons and examples to explain your position 52
- Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past 95
- When people succeed, it is because of hard work. Luck has nothing to do with success. Do you agree or disagree with the quotation above? Use specific reasons and examples to explain your position. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 177, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...chnologies to live and improve further. As a result people need more land areas to...
^^
Line 2, column 322, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...hare to live here freely. If people use all of the lands only for our requirement to live ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 161, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'have'
Suggestion: have
... replaced by any other species and they has their own influence that remains the ea...
^^^
Line 4, column 45, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'placed'?
Suggestion: placed
...onclude, I believe that there should be place to live for animals especially animals ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, then, as to, for example, i feel, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1939.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 392.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94642857143 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65866632202 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515306122449 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 612.0 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.6751705435 48.9658058833 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.1875 100.406767564 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.6045352989 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 5.45110844103 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194261508592 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0704923383923 0.076458572812 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617635443112 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127122576936 0.150856017488 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0673671902724 0.0645574589148 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.