Some people think that human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals. Do you agree or disagree with this point of view? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
Earth has large amount of space. This space is suitable for the needs of every living being here. But if we have a desire to get more than what we actually need, it becomes a problem. Mahatma Gandhi once said- "Earth has enough resources for everyone`s need, but not that enough for everyone`s greed." So I strongly disagree with the statement that - some people think that human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals."
Firstly, there is already a specified amount of space for human beings and animals. And this boundary was drawn by humans only. So why are humans trying to extend their part for their purposes. If we will try to capture lands, meant for forest, for our personal use , It might happen that animal might come over our farms, houses etc and do us harm. For instance, in many northern parts of India which was covered by forest, that part was used for some airport activities. And every other day, there came a news that such a person was eaten by a wild animal.
Secondly, if we will try to build homes, do farming etc. on forest lands. We first have to cut down the trees. And this is a major cause of deforestation. The area which was earlier full of green cover will become a hub for many factories and industries. This will cause pollution and only we will be affected at the end.
Saving lands for endangered animals is our moral duty and is ethically correct. These animal are not able to express themselves, so we should take advantage of this fact. We, human beings, are not becoming extinct. We are already in large number. But these animal will become extinct, if they are not provided with a specified amount of forest land.
We have certain duties to be performed for our environment. Adjusting a little bit or cutting down our comfort needs will not harm us. Lastly, we should understand that we can live in a forest. In fact, humans used to live in a forest. But animal will not be able to live in an industrialized area.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-28 | Mina.2020 | 76 | view |
| 2022-12-17 | MotherAstronaut | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-04 | Rapidbirthday21 | 81 | view |
| 2022-12-04 | Rapidbirthday21 | 78 | view |
| 2022-08-31 | cocoza@gmail.com | 87 | view |
- Some people think that human needs for farmland housing and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals Do you agree or disagree with this point of view Why or why not Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 74
- College students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to ad 50
- If a school was given more money should it be invested inorganising social activities for students after class hours or improve food at cafeteria Support with relevant reasons and examples 80
- People attend school for many reasons for example expanded knowledge social awareness and enhanced interpersonal relationships Why do you think people decide to go to school 73
- The twentieth century saw great change In your opinion what is one change that should be remembered about the twentieth century Use specific reasons and details to explain your choice 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 508, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aving land for endangered animals.' Firstly, there is already a specified am...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 266, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
..., meant for forest, for our personal use , It might happen that animal might come ...
^^
Line 3, column 506, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'news'.
Suggestion: news
...vities. And every other day, there came a news that such a person was eaten by a wild ...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 73, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...formed for our environment. Adjusting a little bit or cutting down our comfort needs will ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, firstly, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, for instance, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 52.1666666667 63% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1694.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 362.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67955801105 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54273343037 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546961325967 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.86738351254 428% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 73.9830899598 48.9658058833 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 67.76 100.406767564 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.48 20.6045352989 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44 5.45110844103 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 16.0 4.88709677419 327% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286105526165 0.236089414692 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0668346042478 0.076458572812 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0676170765098 0.0737576698707 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154816980386 0.150856017488 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.086630020416 0.0645574589148 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.9 11.7677419355 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 58.1214874552 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.27 10.9000537634 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.21 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 86.8835125448 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.