Human beings are very mercurial creature, which often requires things that not necessarily quite significant for the survival of existence. There are many controversial debates that goes around about human needs for farmland ,housing, and industry are more important than land for endangered animals. I adamantly, oppose the idea of human's requirement for these stuffs has higher value than saving the animals that are in verge of extinctions.
First of all, there are many animals which have extinct over the past few years because of the harmful smokes produced from the industries as well as exiguous amount of protection regarding their habitats. We all are quite caveat about the fact that, it is the human feckless which is causing the dramatic change in the environment. For example, along with the modernization, human beings demands for better housing and convenient life has waxed, which has definitely coerced them to use the forest lands. Similarly, with the predilection for the aesthetic pleasing rooms by the use of wooden furniture , many people are even in support of deforestation.
Secondly, if we think pragmatically, then there is huge interdependence of human life with the natural resources and animals. Animals are the one, which has a pivotal reason for the maintenance of the ecosystem in general. For instance, if animals like one-horned rhinos, and other strong animals are killed in order to establish some huge industries for healthy foods without considering it's effect in the maintaining the ecosystem of the particular environment, then this movement in saving the planet would be futile.
Nevertheless, overpopulation of people requires more farmland and housing to live, however, we can't go blindsight about the aggrandization of extinction of endangered animals.
To rebuttal, I have a strong dissonance on the people who thinks that human needs are more important than saving land for endangered animals.
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be 53
- An innovative treatment has come to our attention that promises to significantly reduce absenteeism in our schools and workplaces A study reports that in nearby East Meria where fish consumption is very high people visit the doctor only once or twice per 63
- People s behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting 79
- Claim Many problems of modern society cannot be solved by laws and the legal system Reason Laws cannot change what is in people 039 s hearts or minds Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the 66
- The following recommendation appeared in a memo from the mayor of the town of Hopewell quot Two years ago the nearby town of Ocean View built a new municipal golf course and resort hotel During the past two years tourism in Ocean View has increased n 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 225, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...es around about human needs for farmland ,housing, and industry are more important...
^^
Line 2, column 603, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ing rooms by the use of wooden furniture , many people are even in support of defo...
^^
Line 4, column 96, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...rmland and housing to live, however, we cant go blindsight about the aggrandization ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, nevertheless, regarding, second, secondly, similarly, so, then, well, for example, for instance, in general, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 43.0788530466 37% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1640.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 305.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37704918033 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9605245958 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567213114754 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.0807158329 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.666666667 100.406767564 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4166666667 20.6045352989 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.1666666667 5.45110844103 242% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.368883738418 0.236089414692 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138658580307 0.076458572812 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0897133612874 0.0737576698707 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212900800262 0.150856017488 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0768468025261 0.0645574589148 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 11.7677419355 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 58.1214874552 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 10.9000537634 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.