Some people think that if companies prohibit sending emails to staff on weekends or during other time out of office hours. Staff's dissatisfactions with their companies will decrease. Others think this will not reduce the overall dissatisfactions among staff. What do you think and why?
It is critically important for a company to make sure that its employees are satisfied with their work. I believe that companies could not increase staff satisfaction by simply forbidding emails on weekends. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, preventing emails during the time out of office hours is not practical for global companies. Thanks to the trend of globalization, nowadays more and more companies are building sites over all the world. The staff on these sites mostly live in different time zones. To keep business ongoing, they rely heavily on emails to exchange ideas and information. They can't send emails only during office hours. Imagining an employee based in New York wants to discuss an issue with an employee based in Shanghai, it will be extremely hard to find a common time to communicate, for Shanghai will be at the night while New York is at the day. In this case, emails are essential for the daily operation of modern companies. Ensuring emails only during office hours is just unpractical.
Furthermore, many other factors would influence the way employees think about their companies. For instance, pay and benefits will play a significant role. I know from my personal experience that many people do not mind reasonable work out of their office hours as long as the job pays them well. In addition, many young people, especially those working in startup companies in China, are willing to use their spare time to do some extra work to move further in their careers. Their passion will be ruined if companies simply prohibit overtime work or emails. In other words, people always have different needs. They will only feel contentment when they have the freedom to choose whatever working style they like.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that stopping emails outside of office hours is not a feasible solution to make people feel happier about their companies. The idea won't work for big companies located in different time zones, and it would discourage those hardworking young people who are ambitious about their future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-20 | hswangjinliang | 90 | view |
- The university plans to provide students who are going to enter the university with two summer vacation programs Which one do you think is better for students A Take some college courses in advance such as some courses that are related to their future maj 87
- Some people think that if companies prohibit sending emails to staff on weekends or during other time out of office hours Staff s dissatisfactions with their companies will decrease Others think this will not reduce the overall dissatisfactions among staf 90
- Which one of the following do you think is the best way to get to know a city in a limited amount of time when you first visit it touring historic sites going to markets or shops eating in restaurant and spending time in cafes 76
- Grades encourage students to work harder at school Do you agree or disagree Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 76
- Which one of the following do you think is the best way to get to know a city in a limited amount of time when you first visit it touring historic sites going to markets or shops eating in restaurant and spending time in cafes 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, so, well, for example, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1556.0 1977.66487455 79% => OK
No of words: 319.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87774294671 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54664718728 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542319749216 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 618.680645161 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0123388059 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.733333333 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2666666667 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 5.45110844103 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3257587725 0.236089414692 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110008792575 0.076458572812 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0387861637529 0.0737576698707 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191090939351 0.150856017488 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0384184266792 0.0645574589148 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 86.8835125448 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.