Some people think the media including newspapers, televisions, radio, and internet sources are less concerned about the accuracy of news. They think the information from the media is becoming incorrect. Do you agree with this opinion or not and explain wh

Essay topics:

Some people think the media including newspapers, televisions, radio, and internet sources are less concerned about the accuracy of news. They think the information from the media is becoming incorrect. Do you agree with this opinion or not and explain why? Include examples and specific reasons.

In the modern era, thanks to the advent of technology, people enjoy a wide range of news sources including the internet, television, to name but a handful. In this regard, many believe that despite the abundance of news sources, the accuracy and transparency they provide are not satisfying. However, others have the conviction that media release is trustworthy and give them the required vision upon the world around. I personally subscribe to the view that information from the media is becoming inaccurate. I stand to this viewpoint for two main reasons, which I will elucidate in the following essay.

To begin with, in most countries, the press is not independent of the predominant power, and the free press is somehow an illusion in this world. Unfortunately, despite the abundance of news sources, the information released from the media before going viral undergoes some changes in order to guarantee the profit of some specific political groups. In other words, the news is a slave to some biased policies. For instance, in my country Iran, the wildlife is in a real danger as so much as a considerable number of species are about to extinction. Nevertheless, the media rarely cover the crisis that threatens the rich natural habitat because some individuals, who have connections in the government administration have been accumulated so much wealth by exploiting the rich source of precious species. Accordingly, such a news only distributes by local people living nearby, which will not go viral due to the lack of audience. Therefore, if the press had been autonomous from political superpowers- which is not-, the world would have been a better place to live.

Secondly, there are some website on the internet –for example, wikileaks.com - that make revelation some valid documents about some critical events in the past, which had played crucial roles in the specific period of some countries’ history. These revelations made a few decades after the events make people suspicious about the accuracy of current news. For instance, the effects of superpower countries in the destination of middle- east countries, or the true story behind some wars that took place in the past decades and have left many innocents murdered people. Moreover, regardless of the existence of such websites, most of the critical news released from different sources contradict each other, which leaves people confused and baffled.

To put all into a nutshell, considering all the aforementioned reasons, I firmly believe that free press is just an illusion in the world today, and most of them just give a shadow of real stories. I feel this way inasmuch as not only are they slaves to some biased policies, which guarantee the advantages of some limited groups, but also some websites on the internet reveal documents of past events, which confirm the idea that what we get from the media is being vague.

Votes
Average: 9 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-05-01 aliasghar 73 view
2019-02-24 persepolistmm 85 view
2018-10-31 raminshahbad 73 view
2018-10-31 raminshahbad 73 view
2018-09-25 leila_k 80 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user saar67 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 273, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... accuracy and transparency they provide are not satisfying. However, others have the conviction th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 26, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'websites'?
Suggestion: websites
...ce to live. Secondly, there are some website on the internet –for example, wikileaks...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 246, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'slave'
Suggestion: slave
... this way inasmuch as not only are they slaves to some biased policies, which guarante...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, i feel, in other words, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 52.1666666667 138% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2440.0 1977.66487455 123% => OK
No of words: 476.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12605042017 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67091256922 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83785281093 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52731092437 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 766.8 618.680645161 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.8272476131 48.9658058833 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.555555556 100.406767564 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4444444444 20.6045352989 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.77777777778 5.45110844103 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237656843238 0.236089414692 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0748761848456 0.076458572812 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504446015487 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150228633199 0.150856017488 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0416862613956 0.0645574589148 65% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 11.7677419355 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 58.1214874552 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 86.8835125448 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.