SOME PEOPLE THINK THAT SCIENTISTS MAKE THE MOST IMPORTANT CONTRIBUTION TO SOCIETY. OTHERS THINK THAT THE CONTRIBUTIONS FOF ARTISTS ARE THE MOST IMPORTANT.
Can you imagine your life without today’s modern contrivances, electronic devices, vehicles and smart gadgets? Presumably not at all. But what about living without any piece of art work? Actually, it is quite possible and will not significantly affect the quality of your life. Therefore, though many people insist that artists are of an indispensable significance, I will definitely declare that the role and contributions of scientists are immeasurable. I will explore the most discernible reasons for my viewpoint in the subsequent body paragraphs.
To commence with, for the time being humanity is provided with a lot of edge-cutting technological advances and it is all due to our scientists. The inventions and discoveries, that they make, significantly improve people’s lives and gives them more opportunities. In other words, scientists’ contributions are visible in all walks of life and we have a daily deal with them. To elucidate my point, let us take the internet as an example. The advent of the internet was really a monumental and life-changing invention. Due to the scientists we are like never before provided with boundless sources of information, which are available at any time and at any place we are. We can surf the internet, find different news, jobs, universities, distinguished people and be posted about everyday life events. Moreover, if we dig deeper, we will understand that internet is also a real opportunity for those very artists to develop their skills and introduce their works to the society.
In addition, besides all that technological inventions, scientists has been striving to explain everything that surrounds us, thereby making people be much closer to their nature and world. In other words, they unravel any kinds of unexplainable events of the nature, hence giving us that opportunity to be prevent some disasters and take care of our home. For example, in ancient times people could not have any idea about the effects of their deleterious activities on the nature, therefore were not eager to take steps and look after their environment. On the other hand, today we realize that humanity should be extremely careful to prevent global warming, pollution etc.
In the light of the reasons mentioned above, I will surely state that the contribution of scientists is far more important than the one of artists.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-30 | ChristineSmb | 76 | view |
- People learn things better from those at their own level, than from those at a higher level. 90
- Do you agree or disagree: the best way to solve the world’s environmental problem is to increase the price of fuel. 76
- Life today is easier and comfortable then it was when your grandparents were children. 83
- Many people have learned a foreign language in their own country; others have learned a foreign language in the country in which it is spoken. Which is better? 73
- Do you agree or disagree: Modern technologies have affect the way peoplem communicate with each other. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 676, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o prevent global warming, pollution etc. In the light of the reasons mentioned ab...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 149, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...more important than the one of artists.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, but, hence, if, look, moreover, really, so, therefore, for example, in addition, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2013.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 380.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29736842105 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11454789452 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586842105263 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 639.0 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1839096477 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.947368421 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.31578947368 5.45110844103 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157494354204 0.236089414692 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0426693442588 0.076458572812 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0478210068264 0.0737576698707 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0985683217098 0.150856017488 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0182011681344 0.0645574589148 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.