Some people want to have a job where they can make or do things with their hands. Others prefer having a job where they can work with their heads and thinking.
Which type of job do you prefer?
Having a job is of great perspective in one’s life. There are various types of work available for a person to do. Some people prefer to have jobs that require hands on involvement. Others prefer to work with their mind. Of the given choices, I prefer to have a job that requires brain and knowledge. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explain in further paragraphs.
First of all, work that requires brain and thinking will utilize less amount of physical activity. Moreover, more work can be done efficiently within less amount of time. For example, when I was in college, I had to work at a cafeteria, which required hands on work. This used a lot of my energy. On the other hand, a computer centre would have let me use my brain and work would have been done efficiently. Hence, I did not feel that my time at the cafeteria was used wisely.
Additionally, jobs which uses brain pays off effectively. After all financial stability is of great deal in one’s life. A physician, for instance, he uses his knowledge to diagnose a patient and treat him well. Simultaneously, his knowledge provides him with a good amount of money. Therefore, a job that requires your knowledge will use less of your energy and provide a good amount of money as well.
In conclusion, working with brain and thinking provides a great amount of work efficacy with a financial stability. For these reasons, I prefer to have a job that utilizes my brain and thinking instead of hands.
- Some people want to have a job where they can make or do things with their hands Others prefer having a job where they can work with their heads and thinking Which type of job do you prefer 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement All high school students should be required to have three years of studying a foreign language 60
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 59, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... which uses brain pays off effectively. After all financial stability is of great dea...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, after all, for example, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1228.0 1977.66487455 62% => OK
No of words: 262.0 407.700716846 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68702290076 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.48103885553 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66718256378 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 212.727598566 63% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515267175573 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 385.2 618.680645161 62% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.1344086022 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.0599436081 48.9658058833 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 64.6315789474 100.406767564 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.7894736842 20.6045352989 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42105263158 5.45110844103 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304899467324 0.236089414692 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106010889164 0.076458572812 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0984956898858 0.0737576698707 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208509263252 0.150856017488 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.132306472902 0.0645574589148 205% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.6 11.7677419355 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.33 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 86.8835125448 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 10.002688172 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.0537634409 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 59, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... which uses brain pays off effectively. After all financial stability is of great dea...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, after all, for example, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1228.0 1977.66487455 62% => OK
No of words: 262.0 407.700716846 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68702290076 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.48103885553 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66718256378 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 212.727598566 63% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515267175573 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 385.2 618.680645161 62% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.1344086022 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.0599436081 48.9658058833 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 64.6315789474 100.406767564 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.7894736842 20.6045352989 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42105263158 5.45110844103 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304899467324 0.236089414692 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106010889164 0.076458572812 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0984956898858 0.0737576698707 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208509263252 0.150856017488 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.132306472902 0.0645574589148 205% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.6 11.7677419355 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.33 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 86.8835125448 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 10.002688172 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.0537634409 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.