Some students like classes where teachers lecture ( do all of the talking) in class. Other students prefer classes where the students do some of the talking. Which type of class do you prefer? give specific reasons and details to support your choice.
Some people might claim that the classes where teachers do all the talking will be more effective than where students perform the communication. They cite the noise and disturbance that might occur during talking by students. As a result, classes will be disrupted. However, I completely believe that students should also do the talking along with the teacher simultaneously. I support my claim by giving two main reasons.
Initially, I believe that communication between teachers and students in a class promotes the interaction capability of the student. This often helped to flourish the communicative and debating skills of the student. For example, when I was in University, there was a teacher, who frequently promote active interaction with the student by asking them questions and encouraging us to give our opinion. This type of practice encourages us, students, to prepare about the learning topics and also motivated us to debate our ideas and opinions. Such group interaction was found advantageous as it improved my debating skills which I later used in my professional career. Some of my friends in another class stated that their classes were dull as the teacher presented the information and do most of the talking. As a result, they were not much information about the subject matter.
Further, the Interaction between the teacher and student in a classmate the class is much more interesting. Such practice creates an opportunity for the exchange of varieties of ideas that not only helped to broaden the student knowledge on the subject matter but also develop an energetic environment to study. For example: when I was studying in WRC, our economies class was very interactive, we were given a chance to exchange our ideas relating to the subject matter. Such interaction creates an exciting learning atmosphere and such exchange of knowledge made us much more aware of the related topics. Although, some other students of another college stated that their classes were not interactive and thus idleness during listening made them sleepy instead of focusing on the subject. So, interaction within the classes helped us get a wide range of ideas regarding any subject matter. As a result, our knowledge of particular topics is even enhanced.
People might state that class where the teacher only performs the task of talking provide more time to deliver the information on a particular subject matter. Teachers get more time to deliver his/her knowledge which is not possible when all students are interacting. As a result, the syllabus might not be completed on time. However, I still confide in my opinion that interaction between teacher and student in a class is much more informative and even delivers an opportunity to develop overall debating and conversing skills.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 897, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ideas regarding any subject matter. As a result, our knowledge of particular topi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, regarding, so, still, thus, for example, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2354.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 451.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21951219512 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60833598836 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85795464961 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.447893569845 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 742.5 618.680645161 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4143940561 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.347826087 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6086956522 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.78260869565 5.45110844103 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33088809346 0.236089414692 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104778312281 0.076458572812 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100173921545 0.0737576698707 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233088491569 0.150856017488 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0894668780535 0.0645574589148 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.