Some students enjoy taking distance learning courses on the computer or television Other students would rather take their courses with a teacher in a classroom Which one do you prefer Explain why

Essay topics:

Some students enjoy taking distance-learning courses on the computer or television. Other students would rather take their courses with a teacher in a classroom. Which one do you prefer? Explain why?

In my opinion, I prefer to choose to take distance- learning courses on the computer. The topic leads me to think of some valuable experiences in distance-learning courses in my college. My view is that distance- learning courses can not only let us master the knowledge of courses more efficiently but also save more time studying course materials.

First of all, I take the position that taking distance-learning courses on the computer can diminish our commute time to college. Furthermore, we can make use of our time to preview courses rather than largely consume our energy on commuting. For example, when I was an undergraduate, I used to spend at least thirty minutes taking a bus to my college, and I couldn’t use my time to preview other courses, I could just boringly stand there and entirely waste my time. However, when the college changed the policy because of Covid-19, professors preferably took distance-learning courses on the computer, and this announcement would benefit me to utilize more time to carefully preview course materials in these thirty minutes rather than totally waste my time on commuting. As a result, I can absorb the knowledge of courses better compared to before and put my energy into courses completely.

Second, I would say that taking distance-learning courses on the computer can use a computer to immediately search for answers to the questions we suddenly encounter in courses. For instance, I once took a distance-learning history course, the professor raised a question about the rise and fall of the British Empire. However, no one knew any information about this problem, and the professor seemed to be a little frustrated. Fortunately, we had our computers beside us at that time, so the professor instantly required us to search for the solution to this question, and we finally found the information about this issue, and this course could continue to the end. By contrast, if we took our course in a classroom, we may not promptly obtain the answer without using a computer.

To conclude, these are the two reasons why I prefer to take distance-learning courses on the computer. I am of the view that distance-learning courses not only greatly save more time but also obviously promote our learning efficiency.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-09-20 jimHsu 73 view
2022-09-20 jimHsu 60 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user jimHsu :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, second, so, at least, for example, for instance, of course, as a result, first of all, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 15.1003584229 26% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1903.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 375.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07466666667 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16542881069 2.67179642975 118% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 609.3 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.9949627515 48.9658058833 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.866666667 100.406767564 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.6045352989 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5333333333 5.45110844103 193% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287977129942 0.236089414692 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131595667636 0.076458572812 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.083253732343 0.0737576698707 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210271753345 0.150856017488 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0464476680035 0.0645574589148 72% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, second, so, at least, for example, for instance, of course, as a result, first of all, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 15.1003584229 26% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1903.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 375.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07466666667 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16542881069 2.67179642975 118% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 609.3 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.9949627515 48.9658058833 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.866666667 100.406767564 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.6045352989 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5333333333 5.45110844103 193% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287977129942 0.236089414692 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131595667636 0.076458572812 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.083253732343 0.0737576698707 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210271753345 0.150856017488 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0464476680035 0.0645574589148 72% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.