Some people believe that the studying alone is the best way to focus on their studies. However, in my opinion, studying with others is more helpful because it is a improved studying method and also can motivate students to study harder.
To begin with, studying in a group is a progressed studying method compared to studying alone. By teaching each other, students can develop their ability to find the essential parts of the subject. This ability from group studying can significantly increase students’ academic achivements. A study which is conducted in Seoul National University supports this opinion. In the study, researchers gathered and evaluated the academical score of students who applied to the Korean SAT in 2019. After several examinations, they figured out that the students who had studied with their friends showed much higher scores than the students who had studied alone. This research shows that studying in a group is a more effective way than studying alone to understand the subjects and get higher score in the Korean SAT.
On top of that, having a rival is a good aspect of studying in a group. For most students, having a rival is a motivation to study harder. This results in the better consequences to both rivals and the students. To be specific, when I was in my high-school years, I usually studied at library till late nights. When I became a senior, I studied enthusiacally to get a good score in the Korean SAT. One of my friends joined my night studies from the january 2014, which we had ten months left until the test. Since then, we became each others’ rival and tried to stay longer as much as we could. By watching my rivals’ studying, I was motivated by him and focused to my studies deeper than before. As a result of ten-months of rival relationship, we both got great scores and suceed to enter the universities we wanted to go.
To sum up, studying in a group is beneficial because it is the more progressed way to study and can motivate students to study harder. In this regard, I strongly insist that the studying in a group is more beneficial than studying alone.
- The knowledge we gain from personal experience is more valuable than the knowledge we gain from books Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- 79 Is the ability to write and read more important today than in the past Why or why not Use specific reasons to support your answer 70
- In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today 60
- Drivers should pay an additional fee for driving where there is the greatest amount of traffic 63
- Parents are the best teachers Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 163, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...th others is more helpful because it is a improved studying method and also can m...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, then, thus, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with, to sum up, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1757.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 368.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77445652174 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68778298945 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.475543478261 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 539.1 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.6808146556 48.9658058833 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.85 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.15 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283669636202 0.236089414692 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105353227207 0.076458572812 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0701280698662 0.0737576698707 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213478947356 0.150856017488 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0701522326301 0.0645574589148 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 11.7677419355 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.