The knowledge we gain from personal experience is more valuable than the knowledge we gain from books. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Some people believe that the knowledge from their experience is more valuable compared to that from books. Other people say that reading books can make people understand assorted information from ancestors and to comprehend the lifestyle of other cultural regions. I agree with the latter statement with two elaborated reasons and examples below.
First, people can acquire difficult and high-quality information by reading books. Having indirect experience is helpful for people to get a universal understanding of many different topics. In other words, knowledge from books can make people smarter than before. That knowledge is also beneficial to comprehend the difficult theories such as a definition of the universe and numerous scientific phenomena. For example, people can see the stars’ moving by lookup the sky at night. However, watching the movement of the stars does not mean that people can understand the reason for that. However, by reading science books such as “Cosmos,’ people not only understand the movement of the stars but also foresee the next move of many stars.
Second, reading the books from the other culture makes people understand the lifestyle of other regions’ people. Some people can afford the money to travel around the globe. However, most people cannot travel to every nation on the earth due to many reasons. In this circumstance, reading books which are based on the other nations’ lifestyle can help people to fulfill their eagerness about them. Books from other countries can give much information such as lifestyle, habitat and regional cultures. In addition, understanding other nations around the world can lead people to substantial benefits. For example, there was a man named Marco Polo, who traveled tremendous distances to discover other cultures of the world. As a European merchant, his traveling journal give a serious impact on his colleagues in many countries in Europe. After his travel to Asian regions such as the Mongolian Empire and the Chinese Empire, the people of Europe were inspired and started trading with Asian countries.
In conclusion, people who read books can have many benefits such as deeper understandings about difficult theory and comprehension about other nations. Therefore, I insist that knowledge from books is more valuable and beneficial than that from peoples’ experience.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-06 | prakriti malla | 70 | view |
| 2023-04-06 | prakriti malla | 70 | view |
| 2023-03-27 | joyce05 | 60 | view |
| 2022-09-20 | ting234 | 83 | view |
| 2022-07-12 | Sumit68 | 81 | view |
- Sometimes it is better to be dishonest 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more effective to study in a group of students than to study alone 80
- Some students prefer to study alone Others prefer to study with a group of students Which do you prefer Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Drivers should pay an additional fee for driving where there is the greatest amount of traffic 63
- People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment and not enough on more serious duties and obligations Use your specific reasons and examples to support your answer 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 169, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...ple to get a universal understanding of many different topics. In other words, knowledge from ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 631, Rule ID: EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
Message: Unpaired symbol: '”' seems to be missing
...wever, by reading science books such as “Cosmos,’ people not only understand the ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, second, so, therefore, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 43.0788530466 39% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2001.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 370.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40810810811 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73721878757 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505405405405 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 610.2 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.5481466512 48.9658058833 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.2857142857 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.619047619 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.90476190476 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145644334631 0.236089414692 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0623724526305 0.076458572812 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0956037654059 0.0737576698707 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138390114383 0.150856017488 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.073340519003 0.0645574589148 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.8 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.