Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The knowledge we gain from our personal experiences is more valuable than the knowledge we gain from books. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. Do not use memorized examples.
No one can deny the fact that it is the nature of human being to keep on learning new things be it from their own personal life or various sources. In the given scenario, it is perceived that whether we obtain useful information from distinct sources or from our own experience. Meanwhile, I am of the opinion that knowledge gain practically is precious than attaining from books or any other medium. I feel this way for several reasons which I will explore in the subsequent paragraphs.
To commence on, during our course of time we undertake various task in order to reach our goal. Some confer fruitful result whereas some might be bitter. Having said that, the best part of experiencing exotic task in life is we get to gain life learning lesson. To be more precise, it might be applicable in future matter as well. Drawing from my own experience, I used to learn my local dialect through books and internet. At first, I could memorize some however I tend to forget very soon. After that, what I did was I began to communicate with people who deliver in local language. Indeed, now I have become quiet fluent and able to interact with people in their language which would not happen if I was sticking to the books only. Therefore, until and unless we experience in our own life, we hardly could accomplish it.
Secondly, the more we practice the more we become confedient in life. To be more precise, if we remain persist until we achieve success we will ace our weakness to accomplishment. To exemplify, If I had not stay static and let go while learning language I would never have succeed. Needless to say, personal experience will teach crucial lesson to us to become confedient in life. On other hand, there are many medium through which we can procure information and news however they are not reliable. In addition, written things can be edited yet the knowledge that is imprinted in our mind cannot.
All things considered, knowledge attaining from our own experience is far more valuable than we obtain from any books. Hence, people should never step back from trying to achieve their goal.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-06 | prakriti malla | 70 | view |
| 2023-04-06 | prakriti malla | 70 | view |
| 2022-09-20 | ting234 | 83 | view |
| 2022-07-12 | Sumit68 | 81 | view |
| 2022-07-12 | shuya | 70 | view |
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 73
- There is no shortage of opinion on that the fruit of hard work is sweet and tasty Due to this fact I disagree to say that success solely depends on luck and hard work had no role in this I feel this way for two main reasons which I will explore in the fol 60
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage 90
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 3
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 793, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd unless we experience in our own life, we hardly could accomplish it. Secondly...
^^
Line 3, column 207, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'staid', 'stayed'.
Suggestion: staid; stayed
...omplishment. To exemplify, If I had not stay static and let go while learning langu...
^^^^
Line 3, column 229, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ify, If I had not stay static and let go while learning language I would never ha...
^^
Line 3, column 274, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'succeeded'.
Suggestion: succeeded
...le learning language I would never have succeed. Needless to say, personal experience w...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, whereas, while, i feel, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1740.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 369.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71544715447 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55582424507 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552845528455 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 544.5 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.7930207428 48.9658058833 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.8571428571 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5714285714 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.80952380952 5.45110844103 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29358915677 0.236089414692 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0826376638807 0.076458572812 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0723317057293 0.0737576698707 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196911240312 0.150856017488 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0338170731725 0.0645574589148 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.8 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 793, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd unless we experience in our own life, we hardly could accomplish it. Secondly...
^^
Line 3, column 207, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'staid', 'stayed'.
Suggestion: staid; stayed
...omplishment. To exemplify, If I had not stay static and let go while learning langu...
^^^^
Line 3, column 229, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ify, If I had not stay static and let go while learning language I would never ha...
^^
Line 3, column 274, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'succeeded'.
Suggestion: succeeded
...le learning language I would never have succeed. Needless to say, personal experience w...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, whereas, while, i feel, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1740.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 369.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71544715447 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55582424507 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552845528455 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 544.5 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.7930207428 48.9658058833 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.8571428571 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5714285714 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.80952380952 5.45110844103 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29358915677 0.236089414692 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0826376638807 0.076458572812 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0723317057293 0.0737576698707 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196911240312 0.150856017488 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0338170731725 0.0645574589148 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.8 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.