In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
Some people believe that the numbers of the car would decrease in future. However, other people say that that would not be happened with many reasons. In my opinion, I assert that there would be more cars in future with two elaborated reasons below.
To begin with, people cannot live without cars in civilized regions. To be specific, most of cities are overcrowded these days. Therefore, people have started to develop the outside parts of the main cities. Those developments inevitably increased the necessities for the cars. Without car, many uncomfortable problems follow the people who live outsides of the cities. To be specific, my uncle who works at dental clinic was lived in Gwangmyeong, the outside of metro-Seoul area. At first, he taught that he can live without a purchase for a car. However, his changed his mind within a few weeks. In that area, he failed to commute in time frequently. Moreover, without car, it takes numerous times in buses and trains for him. Eventually, he bought a car last year.
Second, with increasing population in the word, the number of the cars would be increased eventually. The growth speed of human population is unpredictable. Even if there are many people who pass away every years, the numbers of newborn always outweigh those in most countries around the world. Hence, as human population grows, the number of drivers and the number of cars would be increased. Therefore, the number of cars would be increased as time goes by. For example, my parents had only one car before me and my sister were born. However, for now, my family have three cars and two motorcycles. As we grow up, my family had to get more cars to meet each member life patterns. This would be happened to other families.
In conclusion, I insist that there would be more car compared these days due to its necessity and increased human population.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-14 | Astha101 | 70 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | Astha101 | 66 | view |
| 2023-06-23 | YasamanEsml | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-13 | sonyeoso | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-08 | prakriti malla | 73 | view |
- My lifestyle is easier and more comfortable than the one my grandparent experienced when they were young 3
- In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today 60
- Some students prefer classes with frequent discussions between the professor and the students with almost no lecture Other students prefer classes with many lectures and almost no discussion Which do you prefer 73
- It is more important for teachers to connect with students than to be experts in their fields 70
- Sometimes it is better to be dishonest 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 64, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...t the numbers of the car would decrease in future. However, other people say that that wo...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 101, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: that
...se in future. However, other people say that that would not be happened with many reasons...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 85, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the cities') or simply say ''most cities''.
Suggestion: most of the cities; most cities
...s in civilized regions. To be specific, most of cities are overcrowded these days. Therefore, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1555.0 1977.66487455 79% => OK
No of words: 321.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84423676012 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59253676585 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538940809969 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.1344086022 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.3954686138 48.9658058833 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 64.7916666667 100.406767564 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.375 20.6045352989 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 16.0 4.88709677419 327% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170203538237 0.236089414692 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.056795581902 0.076458572812 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0426797149849 0.0737576698707 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11311820775 0.150856017488 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0138218979511 0.0645574589148 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.1 11.7677419355 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.2 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.0537634409 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.