Some universities require students to take classes in many objects. Other universities require students to specialize in one object. Which is better
Annually, many students are graduating with different knowledge about their majors from universities throughout the world. The policies of universities forced students to do an exact program adopted by the educational committee of universities. No one can deny that programs are adjusted without any modification. Nowadays, universities usually adopted two methods for students to take classes first: taking various objects second: focusing on one object. There is a controversial question raises that about which of programs is better? In my opinion, I subscribe the first notion and will explain my reasons hereunder.
First and foremost, with the progressing technology, people need more information about life, also they should know the wide range of knowledge about their career to figure out their difficulties whether they confront with little familiar problems. With this policy, students can learn various objects and be informed about all matter about their major. On the other hand, the second policy says that students have to learn certain material, thus they are sophisticated in the specific branch of science but in another related area they have insufficient knowledge. Presumably, they will cope with some issues in their career, because comprehensive information about a profession is very practical for everyone.
Secondly, everyone has a special talent and interest flourishes in the suitable context. When compelling that students are educated in the wide range objects, universities provide the best contexts to allow that students recognize their orientation. Additionally, this approach helps that students would continue their major in high-level academic, such as master or doctorate degree with high efficiency. On the contrary, another viewpoint can lead to their talents not detected with any program, and even their interests are suppressed because they have not any opportunities. As the standpoint of statistic about Asian universities shows that students graduating with the first educational program are very satisfactory in their career because they work in the interesting context without any mandatory act.
In summary, universities strive to adopt the best education programs for their students; however, I think that first policy is better because not only students have wide range information about their major, but also they have a lot of chances for finding their interest for paving the way for flourishing.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-03-07 | leilasafari | 86 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays. 73
- Topic some people prefer to get up early in the morning and start the day s work Other prefer to get up later in the day and work until late at night 44
- The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many ne friends easily. 60
- Topic: Some people prefer to live in the country. Others prefer to live in the town or big cities. 90
- People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment- doing things they like to do – rather than doing things they should do. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...st for paving the way for flourishing.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, i think, in summary, such as, in my opinion, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2090.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 370.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64864864865 4.8611393121 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89793382479 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559459459459 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 645.3 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.3791525928 48.9658058833 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.625 100.406767564 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.125 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.625 5.45110844103 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216969569597 0.236089414692 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0862838245389 0.076458572812 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.081356779758 0.0737576698707 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145792927903 0.150856017488 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0963849882414 0.0645574589148 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 11.7677419355 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 58.1214874552 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 10.9000537634 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 86.8835125448 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.