At some universities, students take part in making decisions about the issues that affect daily life of everyone on campus such as how many hours the libraries should be open each day or what kinds of food should be served in the cafeteria. But at some universities, experts are hired to make these decisions, and students are almost never involved. Which approach do you prefer and why?
In all societies, people are certainly involved with some choices and must engage in making some decisions. Universities are similar environments in which must be made some significant decisions like open and close times of some places in university, type of restaurant’s foods and so on. A controversial question which is often raised regarding this issue is whether students must take part in making these decisions or universities must hire some experts to make these important choices. Certainly, some people if asked would agree with statement that students are able to do vital works and make significant decisions in universities while others would mention that question depends on a great deal of factors; for example, devoid of experience and excitements and other subjects may be most important factors that cause disturbance in students’ making proper decisions. As far as I am concerned, I adopt a firm position that students are the best individuals who could do these works and make the best decisions particularly if authorities help them. In what follows I will cogently pinpoint my most conspicuous reasons to justify my point of view.
First of all, it’s important to consider that in all societies people, who live in them, are the best persons for making their decisions and do works pertaining to them. Certainly, some people think this idea is not true in universities with inexperienced students. However, in most cases students make these decisions better rather than extraneous consults or hiring the experts. Indeed, because students are involved with their universities’ problems or deficient and liabilities, are able to resolve them better than every people even experts. To illustrate that idea let’s consider the following example. I remember that in my university when a student accepted to be library curator, other students could enhance hours of library and exploited this situation and studied more. As you can see, like every society, in university students can make decisions and do some jobs that some people think experts only can do.
Another significant point to be mentioned is that students usually are juveniles and ingenious, therefore their ideas are better because they often ignore some constraints that would hinder making the best decisions. Of course, some people believe that human with more age and more experience could decide better than juveniles. However, in would be fair to say that in most situations at universities young and clever students could decide and make the hardest decisions and resolve their problems because they do not considers all limits and measures that would sabotage their plans.
Finally, if students take part in making decisions, they doubtlessly will doubtlessly think and feel that they are more beneficial and useful for their universities and endeavor to be more effective. Moreover, this story makes more energetic and jolly students. Take a personal experience as an example; back in university when my university’ authorities were not going to hold soccer competition because of lacking enough dormitory for other universities’ students but students adopted new idea and remove some beds from some rooms to add more place for them and other students. The results of a study conducted in my country indicate that students who are involved with making effective decisions in their universities are energetic eighty percent more happy and energetic rather than students that their universities only hire experts to do these similar works.
By way of conclusion, based on the arguments explored above, I am of the opinion that in most cases students must be first people that are involved with university’ problems and must be first people who make decisions because they are more familiar due to their age and intelligence and understanding could make the best decisions and furthermore it helps them to be more happy and energetic. Consequently, it is highly recommended that universities’ authorities involve more and more their students in making decisions and doing jobs related to university. As a result, I suggest conducting more surveys and studies to answer this question more precisely.
- Some people like to buy and eat their meals at restaurants frequently while others like to do this at home Which do you prefer Why 72
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much moreeffectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.Use specific reasons and examples to suppo 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- tpo 01 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 520, Rule ID: DONT_NEEDS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'consider'?
Suggestion: consider
...olve their problems because they do not considers all limits and measures that would sabo...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 510, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...udents but students adopted new idea and remove some beds from some rooms to add ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, while, for example, of course, as a result, first of all, in most cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 15.1003584229 192% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 9.8082437276 224% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 37.0 13.8261648746 268% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 27.0 11.0286738351 245% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 64.0 43.0788530466 149% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3578.0 1977.66487455 181% => OK
No of words: 665.0 407.700716846 163% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38045112782 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.07814867018 4.48103885553 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9993822267 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 282.0 212.727598566 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.424060150376 0.524837075471 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1137.6 618.680645161 184% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 92.1419755991 48.9658058833 188% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.565217391 100.406767564 155% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.9130434783 20.6045352989 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.52173913043 5.45110844103 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20048860748 0.236089414692 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0725417159824 0.076458572812 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.045538853034 0.0737576698707 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136428103514 0.150856017488 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0375980858795 0.0645574589148 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 11.7677419355 156% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 58.1214874552 60% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.1575268817 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.52 10.9000537634 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 145.0 86.8835125448 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.