In recent decades, in all civilized societies, how to involve students in decision making process at universities has engendered copious controversies among authorities. One of the important questions which is often raised regarding this issue is whether universities should allow students to involve in making decision about the matters related to on campus daily life or not. I firmly concur with the idea that students should be involved in decision making process by universities. In what follows, I will aptly substantiate my viewpoint.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that student can understand the problems of other students better. In fact, they spend most of their time with other students, which can help them to make a better decision related to on campus daily life. They can consider the factors which experts cannot realize in view of the fact that they are not in touch with the students. A survey conducted in our country shows that the universities involving students in decision making have fewer difficulty addressing students problems. It, also, asserts that the more universities involve students in the process, the less students of the universities complain about these matters.
In approaching this issue, apart from the fact mentioned above, one should regard another subtle point meticulously that students can improve their decision making skills by taking part in making decision about on campus issues. Decision making is a process of selecting formal choice among the given options. For an efficient decision making, one must be in a stable mind to weigh positive and negative options. Providing that students are involved in this process, they can see the results and the consequences of their decisions. Additionally, in the event that they make a wrong decision, the consequences are not catastrophic, and they can simply change their decision. But, this opportunity cannot be found anywhere else. Moreover, taking part in the decision making not only help students to develop their decision making skills, it makes them more responsible as well. They can realize that every decision that they make directly affect the daily life of not only them but also other students. As a result, they will understand they should take the responsibility of what they do.
Taking all aforementioned argument into account leads us to the conclusion that universities should contemplate about involving students in making decision about the matters that affect on-campus daily life. It not only helps universities solve the problems better, but also helps students to develop their decision making skills. Consequently, I strongly suggest that authorities put more emphasis on informing universities of these advantages.
- Your friend has the opportunity to choose either one of two types of majors (fields of study), which one of the following two majors do you think is a better choice, and why?-A major that would allow him to finish years of study and get a degree sooner (s 60
- TPO 36- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children(five to ten years old) than to spend money on universit 78
- Governments should spend more money in support of arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. 66
- TPO 36- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children(five to ten years old) than to spend money on universit 60
- do you agree or disagree? The way people dresses is a good indication of his or her personality or character? 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 610, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun students is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...es involve students in the process, the less students of the universities complain a...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, moreover, regarding, so, well, apart from, in fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2325.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 432.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38194444444 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55901411391 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82780472319 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.469907407407 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 714.6 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9274547518 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.714285714 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5714285714 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 5.45110844103 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264521515723 0.236089414692 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0911997684079 0.076458572812 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0668920260305 0.0737576698707 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188724518757 0.150856017488 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0525694191496 0.0645574589148 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 10.9000537634 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.