Arrangements in universities such as how many hours that the libraries should be open or what kind of food should be served in the cafeteria affect students' academic lives as well as their living standards on campus. Some people argue that students should not be involved in making such decisions, and experts ought to be hired to do the job exclusively. Nevertheless, from my perspective, universities should take opinions from students seriously and allow them to participate in the decision-making process.
On the one hand, contributing to the policy on the campus, students will be more satisfied with their school lives, and their devotion toward their universities will grow in the meantime. As students own the right to adjust the arrangements, their specific needs are more likely to be met. For instance, when the finals are approaching, the demands for extra opening time for the library will rise significantly. Students could ask the library to open during the night time or extend the opening hours at the end of each term if they could participate in the decision of library policy. As a result, they can study in a better environment compared to cafes or other available places, and thus more appreciation for their universities.
On the other hand, the services provided by schools will be more efficient if students could access to the decision-making process. As the policy is designed based on their needs, students are more likely to take advantage of services instead of wasting them. For example, if the food sold in the cafeteria are popular among students, the revenues will be high, and less food will be thrown away because of spoiling. Only when the policymakers take the voice of students seriously could they succeed in making decisions.
Admittedly, asking students to make decisions tend to cost a considerable amount of time of both students and universities since opinions need to be collected and investigations are required to be made. However, the pay off for such conducts will bypass the costs of doing them as it is harder to withdraw a policy once the money and time are invested in that project.
In summary, it is wise to allow students to play a role in the decisions about issues that affect the daily life of everyone on campus because firstly, students will live a smoother life as their needs are satisfied, and secondly, the policy will be more efficient if students' opinions are taken into consideration. Finally, the benefits of allowing students to participate are well above the costs of it.
- Do you agree or disagree: In order to succeed in study or job，the ability to adjust or adapt to changing condition or circumstance is more important than having knowledge. 88
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: Your job has more effect on your happiness than your social life does. 73
- 7.Some young people are free in the evenings or have days off at school, which way can bring them the most benefit?1)to accumulate work experience by a part-time job or volunteering in a community2)learning to play a sport3)learning to play a musical inst 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Some people prefer to buy technological devices as soon as they are available to the public. Others people prefer to wait until many people have used them. Which do you prefer? 73
- Do you agree or disagree? Rather than help children with their schoolwork, parents should encourage their children do their work independently 83
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, in summary, kind of, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2132.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 425.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01647058824 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87414822646 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 674.1 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.4242673675 48.9658058833 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.25 100.406767564 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5625 20.6045352989 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.875 5.45110844103 218% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.372522405495 0.236089414692 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11815621128 0.076458572812 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103367051922 0.0737576698707 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208612701789 0.150856017488 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12079371845 0.0645574589148 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 11.7677419355 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 58.1214874552 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.