Sometimes we are assigned to work in a group on a project. do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The group will be helped more by person who will be willing to do what other group members want than by person who often strongly insists that things should be done in a way that is different from what the group wants to do.
Nowadays, a monumental amount of works have being done in groups which emphasis the importance of group works in different societies. Personally speaking, I strongly believe that group will be helped more by person who will be willing to do what other group members want due to some reasons. I will elaborate upon the momentous reasons in the following paragraphs.
First, less friction would happen in the group whenever anybody respects a majority vote. In my view, when a person strongly insists that things should be done in a way that is different from what the group wants to do, friction would more frequently happen among the members of the group. One negative outcome of this event is that the relationships between co-workers would be weaken which bodes ill for the whole project. To illustrate this, I would like to give an example of my own experiences. Several years ago, I worked in a computer-company in which I had a coworker who was not flexible enough for team works. Eventually, having too many friction, we could not concentrate on what we were doing. Therefore, inasmuch as the relationships between coworkers was not strong enough, the whole project failed.
Second, a monumental amount of works would have been done in the specific amount of time if anyone interested to do what other group members want. It goes without saying that should people in a group spend significant amount of time for making decisions or for convincing one person to obey the rule, they would waste their time. Without a doubt, the more time would be wasted, the less work would be done. According to resent research conducted by the Isfahan University of Technology, about twenty-five present of the time dedicated to a projects spend on making decision; which is a substantial amount of time. Deeming a person cannot abide by the decisions which has been made in the group, what would happen? How much time would waste? In a word, should a person insists in his belief, there would not be enough time for doing the projects on time.
In the final analysis, according to above-mentioned points and examples, I firmly agree that a person who obey a majority vote would be too lucrative a person for the group since this kind of personality are really useful for enriching the relationships between co-workers. Besides, less time would be wasted for making decisions which free up more time for having works done. Then, I highly recommend that the decisions of majority should be taken over our personal belief in order to help a group.
- TPO46 80
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how the proposal discussed in the lecture would solve the specific challenges described in the reading passage. 78
- It is important to read or watch news presented by people with different views than by similar view Do you agree or disagree 88
- TPO 42 task 1 3
- Do you agree or disagree? People can solve important problems by themselves or by their families; thus, it is almost not necessary to refer to the government. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 643, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun friction seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much friction', 'a good deal of friction'.
Suggestion: much friction; a good deal of friction
... for team works. Eventually, having too many friction, we could not concentrate on what we we...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 538, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a project' or simply 'projects'?
Suggestion: a project; projects
...y-five present of the time dedicated to a projects spend on making decision; which is a su...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, really, second, so, then, therefore, kind of, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 9.8082437276 224% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 2.0 13.8261648746 14% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2109.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 432.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88194444444 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55901411391 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69040739791 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497685185185 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 653.4 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2460632082 48.9658058833 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.45 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8 5.45110844103 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.387327082995 0.236089414692 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129793848478 0.076458572812 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.139109448541 0.0737576698707 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.296965491787 0.150856017488 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.166264042922 0.0645574589148 258% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.