Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the points made in the reading passage. You have 20 minutes to type your response.
The article states that the current variety of organisms that exist on earth must be preserved but this safeguarding of endangered species is unnatural and provids three reasons for support. However, the professor explains that and refutes each of reason's author. He states that it is not true and there will be strong argument.
First, the author asserts that the extinction of any animal will certainly be ecological disaster is an exaggeration. However, the lecture refutes this point by saying that. He explains that dramatic shit in earth causes harm to dinosaur's life. He stating that this event changes ecosystem of earth.
Second, the article claims that genetic engineering scientists heal disease and lose of one species to extinction will not significantly harm the progress of medicine. The professor opposes this point by stating that genetic engineering is an importat field but nature is different. He explains that 40% of researchs allocate to saving of endangered species that this number is very insignificant. Sadly, most of scintists lose this researchs.
Third, the auther declars that the high cost of saving a species from extinction is often not justified. However, the lecture reject this point by montion that saving a species have adavantage. He says that 43% of American Condor extinct recently. The rest of Condor provide meet for 10000 of people. This animal deserve financial business for saving of extinction.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-18 | zahra.tmmm | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | zahra.tmmm | 60 | view |
| 2019-08-14 | marysv | 60 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statements？ Because people are busy doing so many different things, they do very few things well. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the points made in the reading passage. You have 20 minutes to type your response. 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 88
- Some parent offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school Do you think this is a good idea?Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents job than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents job Use specific reasons and examples to support your answe 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 228, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rt. However, the professor explains that and refutes each of reasons author. He s...
^^
Line 2, column 248, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'He' must be used with a third-person verb: 'states'.
Suggestion: states
...earth causes harm to dinosaurs life. He stating that this event changes ecosystem of ea...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 52.1666666667 46% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1215.0 1977.66487455 61% => OK
No of words: 230.0 407.700716846 56% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28260869565 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 4.48103885553 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71698779613 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 212.727598566 59% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547826086957 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 365.4 618.680645161 59% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.94265232975 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.3778322293 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.9375 100.406767564 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.375 20.6045352989 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.625 5.45110844103 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 11.8709677419 17% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.073860354003 0.236089414692 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0274827933848 0.076458572812 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0311443542734 0.0737576698707 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0493418174643 0.150856017488 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0104217063325 0.0645574589148 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.1575268817 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.75 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 86.8835125448 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.