Taking a lot of time to make an important decision is often considered as a bad quality for a person, while some
people think that it is a good quality for a person. Which do you prefer?
Every one has to make numerous decisions during the whole life. Sometimes the decision is something that doesn’t matter, such as what to eat at lunch or which of dresses we should wear. By contrast, there are also a myriad of decisions which mean a lot to us, such as which job or major we should choose. From a practical point of view, some people may assert that it is ineffective for us to spending a long time making an important decision for the sake of time-efficiency. However, I definitely oppose this opinion since it is extremely significant for us to make a complete consideration before we make choices, especially the important ones.
Admittedly, some people may concern that taking a lot of time to make a decision may occupy them too much time and effort, even though the decision may be crucial for them. They believe that if they have been always hesitating for a long time about the choice they are going to make, it is just a waste of their precious time. By contrast, if they make every choice decisively, the time they have saved can be used to do other meaningful things. Besides, by making decision without hesitation, they may never miss any invaluable opportunities, like a decent job or a chance of promotion. Therefore, the aforementioned reasons can account for why many people regard spending a long time deciding as a useless and unworthy thing.
However, although it may cost us more time if we take all of the benefits and consequences into thorough consideration when facing some significant choice, I still believe that it’s worth it. We should keep in mind that sloppy decision-making can get punished swiftly, otherwise it may take us even more time to make up for our abrupt choice. For instance, when the government consider about whether they should establish factories in a resident area, if they decide to build them due to their dramatic benefits without taking the contaminants they may cause into consideration, the city is totally likely to confront environmental hazards in the near future. As a result, the authorities may have no choice but to spare no effort to address the pollution for many years, which could be avoided if they took several hours to completely consider the potential outcomes. Hence, taking more time to make consideration before we make a significant decision is not a waste of time. Instead, it is time-efficient since it can help us avoid potential outcomes.
In sum, although the vast majority may assert that taking much time to make an important decision is unworthy, I believe it is a merit which enables us to prevent negative results and make better choices.
- Fifteen years ago, Omega University implemented a new procedure that encouraged students to evaluate the teaching effectiveness of all their professors. Since that time, Omega professors have begun to assign higher grades in their classes, and overall stu 55
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the planning department of an electric power company."Several recent surveys indicate that home owners are increasingly eager to conserve energy. At the same time, manufacturers are now marketing many home 55
- Some companies in the United States have developed wellness programs that give rewards or incentives to employees for achieving certain health related goals such as stopping smoking or losing weight The rewards and incentives include cash prizes extra vac 95
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement One can learn a lot about another person from the books and the movies that the person likes 87
- Nations should suspend government funding for the arts when significant numbers of their citizens are hungry or unemployed.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning f 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 192, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nch or which of dresses we should wear. By contrast, there are also a myriad of ...
^^
Line 5, column 200, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[8]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put between 'have' and 'been'.
Suggestion: have always been
...ial for them. They believe that if they have been always hesitating for a long time about the ch...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 55, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ugh it may cost us more time if we take all of the benefits and consequences into thorough...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, as to, for instance, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2211.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 451.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90243902439 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60833598836 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86715350486 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.50110864745 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 721.8 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.6808585255 48.9658058833 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.058823529 100.406767564 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5294117647 20.6045352989 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35294117647 5.45110844103 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276431554592 0.236089414692 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105916643951 0.076458572812 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0628013447871 0.0737576698707 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194198942601 0.150856017488 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0329184670523 0.0645574589148 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 58.1214874552 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.