Taking a lot of time to make an important decision is viewed as a bad quality for a person to have, but, in fact, it's a good quality for a person to have.
There are several situations that require people to make an important decision in their life: high school students need to decide which university to enter and what field to major in; workers are required to opt which companies to work in; parents need to make a decision about what kind of education will their children receive. An undeniable fact is that making a swift decision can actually help people to save time, which mislead some people to generate the opinion that spending much time to make an significant decision is a bad quality. However, this view suffers from both logical and factual fallacies. From my perspective, I strongly hold the opinion that this is a good quality for people.
First, a big picture of the problem can be seen if people are allowed to have more time to make a decision. As a matter of fact, with more time, people are allowed to assemble more information from different sources, which can help them to see the big picture of their issues; On the other hand, people who simply make a swift decision may miss out those precious information and thus fail to think comprehensively. My personal experience can be a compelling example of this. The last time when I was required to pick one offer from different universities, I took a meticulous consideration, surfing each university's website to check their ranks, locations, professors, and alumni to check whether they can ensure me to get a desirable job and education. Eventually, I decided to go to Duke university in that I found that their professors had a strong academic background and its curriculum was well-developed, which could help me to better cultivate my professional skills so that I could hunt for a good job. Had it not been for those information assembled from their websites, I would choose another university because of its ostensible fame while hardly could it satisfy my needs.
Second, spending much time can allow people to avoid mistakes. This is because long-time thinking enables people to weigh the advantages and disadvantages of their choices. Take the case of NASA, a widely recognizable space-exploration organization that determined whether humans should migrate to asteroids or not as an example. Initially, NASA weighed the benefits of this: Asteroids were rich in minerals and they were easy to reach for humans. However, they also weighed the downsides of their plan: Asteroids' low-gravity environment would make people suffer from serious problems like the loss of muscle mass and bone density, not to mention the considerable amount of fuel for supporting the spaceship. As a result, they decided to give up this plan since its disadvantages outweighed the advantages.
In a nutshell, it's a good quality that humans make an important decision by a meticulous consideration, which might take a long time.
- TPO73 80
- Your friend plans to reduce his living expense He has following three options 1 Find a roommate to share the room to reduce costs 2 Buy fewer expensive electronic devices like smart phones 3 Cook more at home buy fewer expensive food items and not go to r 42
- Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harmful chemicals may be doing to the 80
- The best way for parents to teach their children about responsibility is to have the children care for an animal 73
- When a new technological device becomes available some people buy it right away others wait until many have adopted it Which view do you agree with Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 503, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...opinion that spending much time to make an significant decision is a bad quality. ...
^^
Line 3, column 1033, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this information' or 'those informations'?
Suggestion: this information; those informations
...unt for a good job. Had it not been for those information assembled from their websites, I would ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 273, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ion organization that determined whether humans should migrate to asteroids or no...
^^
Line 7, column 16, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...ghed the advantages. In a nutshell, its a good quality that humans make an impo...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, however, if, may, second, so, thus, well, while, kind of, as a matter of fact, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2371.0 1977.66487455 120% => OK
No of words: 469.0 407.700716846 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05543710021 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65364457471 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93554864036 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539445628998 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 756.9 618.680645161 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 87.9151053229 48.9658058833 180% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.470588235 100.406767564 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5882352941 20.6045352989 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.76470588235 5.45110844103 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259301281058 0.236089414692 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0795205376693 0.076458572812 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0712578798719 0.0737576698707 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179468382011 0.150856017488 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0815552630841 0.0645574589148 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 11.7677419355 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 58.1214874552 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 86.8835125448 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.