Teacher at a high school think that some of their students are bored or uninterested in learning. In your view, which ONE of these actions that teachers can take will be most effective in increasing high school students’ interest in learning? Why?
- Using Technology in their classrooms more often.
- Asking students to work more often in groups or teams instead working a lone
- Explaining how the lessons they tech in the classroom have a connection to events in the world outside the classroom
Today there is no shortage of debate that students lose their interest in education, because there are a large number of other activities which are much pleasure than studying. Nowadays, teachers try to increase students` interest in studying using some approaches, such as, applying brand new technology. From my point of view, the best option for solving this problem will be organizing group tasks and I feel this way for some reasons.
First of all, all students like surround themselves by friends. It is common knowledge that students do not want to attend their classes because they prefer to spend time with their friends. Moreover, they often neglect their homework because they feel it is boring and tedious. For this reason, it will be a good idea to ask students to perform some assignment with group of friends. I suppose that this new option attracts students` attention on studying because doing tasks will be enjoyable and interesting for them. For example, I used to do all my home assignment by myself. Unfortunately, it seems me quite monotonously to perform it. However, when I decided to do homework with my classmates, all tasks became funny and enjoyable.
Secondly, usually there are some people in the class who do not mix up with their classmates. It goes without saying that every class has a person who used to be always alone for some reasons, such as, bullying or withdrawnness. Consequently, this person recently has any friends among classmates. According to this, I consider that if teacher proposes some group assignments, this person will have an opportunity to make some friends and change his withdrawn image. I have an example of my new friend. He always was alone and did not have any people to communicate with. Furthermore, he seemed me a little bit weird because of his lonely. Luckily, group task which was given by my teacher gave me a chance to know his personality better. In addition, now he is one of my best friends.
By the way of conclusion, I strongly convinced that more group tasks will produce students` interest in education and also help some student to meet new friends.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 104, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...nterest in education, because there are a large number of other activities which are much pleasur...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 506, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put after the verb 'was'.
Suggestion: was always
... I have an example of my new friend. He always was alone and did not have any people to co...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 600, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...icate with. Furthermore, he seemed me a little bit weird because of his lonely. Luckily, g...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, for example, i feel, i suppose, in addition, such as, by the way, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1788.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 361.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95290858726 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81136824471 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540166204986 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 544.5 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.0997348972 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.1428571429 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1904761905 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.7619047619 5.45110844103 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193344046283 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0571632431615 0.076458572812 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540770380685 0.0737576698707 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140614442585 0.150856017488 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431562733943 0.0645574589148 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 11.7677419355 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.