A teacher’s ability to relate well with the students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught.
The rapid changes and complexity of today’s world put new demands on the societies and governments. Education system as an integral part of these new alterations which requires dealing with lots of challenges. Therefore, a plethora of people is in the conviction that teachers should have enough ability to establish relationship with students. Contrary to this popular belief, there are those who argue that teacher’s knowledge is more important factor. I am of the opinion that, both of the mentioned view points have their own merits and drawbacks, and the following explanation will further elaborate on this perspective.
First and foremost, applying some methods that play the vital role in increasing the students’ motivation can be very effective. One the most influential approaches is the tutor’s capability to have good relations with their fellow students. Due to the fact that in early ages this factor is undoubtedly the only stimulus to encourage children to learn new materials. Imagine a 7 years old girl that has experienced bad days as she has been separated from her mother. The teacher’s knowledge is not a matter of concern in this circumstance since the kid need the affection and intimation of a kind teachers that can calm her and distracted her from all those anxieties. Indeed, this factor is comparatively important in diverse age-category because in every stage of life students demand particular supports; therefore, the teachers as the individuals who closely communicate with the students and are highly aware of their features can have essential function in their improvement and decrease their problems.
Another crucial fact that should be taken into consideration is that the main driver that draws the children to the schools is gaining knowledge in order to be prepared to inter into the society in the future. Admittedly, lecturers are the core of this path so that their knowledge and also their ability to transfer this knowledge to the students are undeniable segment of this process. Although the teachers’ attitudes toward shaping the students mindset is very important issue, without having enough knowledge the student cannot accomplish to their final goals. For instance, in high school, students should prepared to attend to the college and most of them choose their field that they are going to be specifies in that. As a result, they can get admission from a famous university if they can compete with other students who are well-informed. That is why no one can overlook the importance of teacher’s knowledge.
On the basis of the points mentioned above, I am convinced that both relations with the students and teacher’s knowledge are accounted as the absolute necessities for children prosperity in school time, however, each of them may be more important in specific ages. Consequently, students not only need to get support from their teachers but also they should gain the needed information to be successful in the education.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-02 | anasemad11 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | anasemad11 | 60 | view |
| 2019-10-10 | oscar21 | 70 | view |
| 2019-09-06 | SERDARKOCAK | 70 | view |
| 2019-08-30 | NidhiKalani | 3 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 613, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'teacher'?
Suggestion: teacher
... the affection and intimation of a kind teachers that can calm her and distracted her fr...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 445, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...hers apos; attitudes toward shaping the students mindset is very important issue, withou...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, look, may, so, therefore, well, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2535.0 1977.66487455 128% => OK
No of words: 491.0 407.700716846 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16293279022 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70728369723 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77200408012 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 255.0 212.727598566 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519348268839 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 783.9 618.680645161 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.5186066486 48.9658058833 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.421052632 100.406767564 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8421052632 20.6045352989 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36842105263 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332999853906 0.236089414692 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101838257192 0.076458572812 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0718525139598 0.0737576698707 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22215471801 0.150856017488 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0449419180659 0.0645574589148 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 11.7677419355 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 86.8835125448 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 70 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.