A teacher s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer | TOEFL IELTS GMAT GRE SAT ACT PTE ESL

Essay topics:

A teacher’s ability to relate well with students is more important than
excellent knowledge of the subject being taught.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Teachers have always played a double role in kids’ school life, as not only do they provide them with fundamental knowledge on certain subjects but they also influence how they develop. Personally, I believe that teachers should aim to build friendly relationships with their students rather than solely teach them everything that is written in a textbook. I feel this way for two main reasons that I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, when teachers succeed in gaining the affinity of their students the learning process can be both improved and facilitated. In other words, when teachers have a connection with their students and since all pedagogical strategies do not work for every classroom and all students, it makes it easier for them to spot their learning weaknesses and help each one of them individually. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. Around ten years ago, when I was in the 9th grade, I had a math teacher that I will remember forever. Not only was she taking pleasure in performing her duties as a teacher but she was genuinely interested in getting to know us as well. As a result, she adjusted her ways of teaching to our needs and finally she also managed to increase our eagerness to learn and seek further information about topics under discussion on our own. Therefore, we ended up understanding fully all the lessons without them being dull.
Secondly, parents do not send their children to school so that they can only grasp academic concepts but to prepare them for the life they are going to encounter after graduating. To be more specific, when teachers do not just lecture on their acquired knowledge but turn the traditional passive lessons into interactive ones and take various approaches to teaching, they help them to develop valuable skills that will benefit them later in their adulthood as well as to gain complete comprehension of the curriculum . Also, the content that is being covered proves to be more meaningful even if less specific information is provided. For instance, when I was in high school I had a professor that used to dedicate one hour a week to discussions about everyday topics or problems. In this way, he taught us implicitly how to respect each other and how we should work in a group. At the same time, though, we had the opportunity to learn life lessons as he usually gave us examples from his own life that illustrated clearly what he meant.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that the teachers’ main goal should be to bond with their students and not only try to transmit to them excessively detailed information on a subject. This is because not only will the students retain more knowledge this way but they will also acquire social skills.

Votes

This essay topic by users

Post date	Users	Rates	Link to Content
2020-08-06	tinaskrd	78	view
2020-08-06	tinaskrd	90	view
2020-08-06	tinaskrd	81	view

Essay Categories

Independent TOEFL Writing

Essays by user tinaskrd :

>>> more essays by the user >>>

Write an essay by this topic

Comments

Essay evaluations by e-grader

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 518, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...complete comprehension of the curriculum . Also, the content that is being covered...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, as to, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, first of all, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 70.0 43.0788530466 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2286.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 473.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83298097252 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66353547975 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7111116547 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 255.0 212.727598566 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53911205074 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 694.8 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.279547336 48.9658058833 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.0 100.406767564 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2777777778 20.6045352989 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.27777777778 5.45110844103 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183855939496 0.236089414692 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0588902993068 0.076458572812 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.041386570055 0.0737576698707 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12522838364 0.150856017488 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0233288502526 0.0645574589148 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 86.8835125448 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.