A teacher's ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught. Use specific reasons and support your answers with examples
It is an undeniable fact that a teacher plays very crucial role in a child’s development as he/she learns most of the information from a teacher. Teachers do the most tough job as delivering knowledge to someone else is not an easily task. From my vintage point a teacher’s ability to relate well with students is more important that excellent knowledge for the following significant reasons.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that teaching is a kind of art and not everyone has this skill. Indeed, there are several people in the world, who have wide range knowledge about different subjects; however, they do not have an ability to explain the information in such a way that other people can understand the concept. Specially, when it comes to students it is a very essential for a teacher to know how to get along easily in order to make the study, efficient and fun. The art of delivering information to students is vital for a teacher to get maximum output of the lecture. A professor should be flexible with the time frame, as sometime poor students do not get the concept or ideas, at that time a professor has to adopt other strategies to be understood by students. Thus, teaching is a kind of artistic work.
Another point that deserve some words is that a teacher’s ability is immense to make subject interesting for students. Apparently, study is a tedious task, hence students become bored with the same old study techniques. It’s necessary for teachers to come up with different methods to encourage students to do study. For instance, my biology professor used several approaches in the classroom in order to get student’s attention such as charts, tables, live presentation of animals, power point presentation etc. Even though, it was very hard for him to prepare himself for different tasks, he stayed optimistic and motivates. With the help of teaching skills, a teacher forces students to dig in to a study subject to understand the concepts thoroughly. Additionally, highly educated professors have a great pool of knowledge and experience but they do not have communication skills.
Finally, the relationship between a teacher and students would strengthen if a teacher knows how to deal with different kinds of students. Certainly, some students have poor understanding of the material, then a professor has to stay calm and patient. If he will give it up, then students won’t learn from him. Additionally, when a teacher is friendly in nature, pupils ask question to him/her without any hesitation. Hence, students always remember this kind of tutors.
To wrap up, an ability of teachers to get along with learners is very important in order to deliver productive lectures, to make subject fun and to build relationship with pupils.
- TPO- test15- cane toad 73
- technology has made children less creative than they were in the past 58
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. 56
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement A teacher s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught 70
- Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone online games and social networking Web site 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 230, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('easily') instead an adjective, or a noun ('task') instead of another adjective.
...vering knowledge to someone else is not an easily task. From my vintage point a teacher's...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 254, Rule ID: VINTAGE_POINT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'vantage point'?
Suggestion: vantage point
...one else is not an easily task. From my vintage point a teacher's ability to relate well...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, finally, first, hence, however, if, so, then, thus, well, as to, for instance, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2346.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 464.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05603448276 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64119157421 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96087434764 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497844827586 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 726.3 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Interrogative: 3.0 0.994623655914 302% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6279419973 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.636363636 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0909090909 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.09090909091 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291479723691 0.236089414692 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0883982854946 0.076458572812 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0842351628224 0.0737576698707 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182728453665 0.150856017488 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.054815510865 0.0645574589148 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.