A teacher's ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught. Use specific reasons and details to support your answer
Students meet many teachers every year. Every teacher has a different personality and traits. There is a teacher who is knowledgeable and uses very effective teaching methods. Another teacher has strong relationships with students and maybe he or she does not have great knowledge. However, you can see how much students love them. I believe that teacher should keep a good relationship with each student. That makes students like the course and do their best to get higher grades. In addition, students never forget their teachers who keep good relation with them. They remember their teachers even after graduation.
Teachers are responsible for making students like or hate the course. In other words, Teachers who treat their students well and love them as their children make students love them and listen to them as they listen to their parents. As a result, they admire the course and they can do anything to get higher grades in this course. In contrary, If teachers do not like their students and treat them badly or regularly punish them for not doing homework or anything else, it will be noticeable that students` grades in their courses will be lower than any other courses. because students hate both the teacher and the subject they do not study for these courses. Thus schools should encourage their teachers to relate to students If they want their students to get higher grades.
Students usually remember their teachers especially good teacher who treated them with love and care during school. Whereas if the teachers were treating them badly or hurt their feeling at least once, they will never remember them. Even if they remember bad teachers they remember how bad they were, how they punished them and made them hate all the courses. In other words, Good Teachers will never be forgotten, but bad teacher no one wants to remember them. So all teacher need to love their students if they want to be remembered even after many years.
In the end, all educational institutions should encourage their Teachers to make good relations with all students. That is beneficial for teachers, students, and the school or university itself.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Question: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- It has been said, "Not everything that is learned is contained in books." Compare and contrast knowledge gained from experience with knowledge gained from books. In your opinion, which source is more important? Why? 60
- TOEFL iBTTPO 53 - Integrated Writing TaskMany countries require cigarette smokers to pay particularly high taxes on their purchases of cigarettes; similar taxes are being considered for unhealthy foods. The policy of imposing high taxes on cigarettes and 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 308, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...eat knowledge, however, you can see how much students love them. I believe that teac...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, thus, well, whereas, at least, in addition, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 52.1666666667 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1762.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 351.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01994301994 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46745029768 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 212.727598566 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.452991452991 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 513.9 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.8953640458 48.9658058833 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.466666667 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53333333333 5.45110844103 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176470135397 0.236089414692 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0919676239376 0.076458572812 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0305889435103 0.0737576698707 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123338572804 0.150856017488 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0473517648604 0.0645574589148 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.25 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 86.8835125448 63% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.