teachers are influential for students than friends. Do you agree or disagree?
The teachers are part of education. Teachers always motivate students while friends urge them. Teachers and friends both are a vital part of a student's life. Although the plethora of people hold the opinion that students are more influenced by teachers I believe that friends are more influential for students. I feel this way because of a few reasons which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, students are closer to their friends and they spend more time with friends. Therefore, obviously, they are more influential for the students. Some friends are together from school to college. They have shared many situations and emotions with each other. Additionally, friends help in bad situations and are a part of happiness. Moreover, teachers are not close to the students as friends. There is a boundary between student and teacher. A teacher teaches in the school for a while, whereas, in the rest of the day students spend major time with friends to play or to hang around with friends.
The second and the same exquisite proof for this assertion is friends are almost in the same age group, so their thinking and goal are in the same direction. Since they always share everything with each other, friends encourage each other. Since students are in a competitive world, they have to do hard work for a great future. Friends are always influential to study. For instance, when I was in higher secondary school, one of my friends was very hard-working. I was not serious in the study, but she motivates me and started to study with me every day. As a result, I got good grades in class. However, in-class teachers also encourage the students to work hard to achieve a goal. Teachers give tricks to the students as well as resolve their problems.
By the way of conclusion, based on the above-mentioned arguments, I think that friends are more important for the students because after parents they are closer to them. Since friends are in the same competitive world, they support and motivate each other.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-21 | Zmx_109 | 88 | view |
| 2023-05-05 | Umme Abiha | 70 | view |
| 2023-04-05 | prakriti malla | 60 | view |
| 2023-03-17 | Anurag96 | 76 | view |
| 2023-03-05 | fmichela | 76 | view |
- do you agree or disagree teachers are valued and appreciated by past day more than nowadays 70
- do you agree or disagree that young people should take opinion from famous personalities rather than older people. 70
- Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Others believe that it is best to use that time doing things related to schoolwork. 60
- y topics:Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away-Wait until the class or mee 63
- colonization on asteroid 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 144, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
... and friends both are a vital part of a students life. Although the plethora of people h...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nts as well as resolve their problems. By the way of conclusion, based on the a...
^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... they support and motivate each other.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, well, whereas, while, for instance, i feel, i think, as a result, as well as, by the way, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1692.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 346.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8901734104 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6265300612 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 212.727598566 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.471098265896 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 505.8 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.6780956112 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.5 100.406767564 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.4166666667 20.6045352989 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.91666666667 5.45110844103 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 21.0 11.8709677419 177% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242701854217 0.236089414692 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0863733209964 0.076458572812 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0773276851288 0.0737576698707 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160627663278 0.150856017488 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0641505577545 0.0645574589148 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 11.7677419355 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 58.1214874552 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.49 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.16 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 86.8835125448 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.