coal ash strictly prohibited
The reading and the lecturer are both about coal ash which is a harmful material that contains the small amount of potentially harmful chemicals. The author of reading believes that there are three regulation systems which will affect the reduction in use of coal ash. The lecturer effectively casts doubts on the claims made in the article.
First of all, the author claims that there is already existence of regulation for companies to use linear- special material in new landfill they build. Moreover, which will prevent the leaking of chemicals into soil and prevent the adverse effects.
The lecturer challenged this point and states that this law is only in new landfill. Furthermore, he points out about old landfill are responsible for leakage f chemicals in underground. This would affect the underground water which is useful for drinking water, so this law must be applied in old landfill too.
Secondly, the author states that if strict rules for material handling and storage will created, then consumers may become concerned about buying recycle material like coal ash. The lecturer refutes this argument and asserts that other dangerous materials are still handling and storage carefully like mercury. He elaborates on this by mentioning that consumers will not be afraid to purchase recycle material, so it is not worth to make strict rules against it.
Thirdly, the author mentions that if new regulation would increase in the disposal and handling cost of the power station has to increase in electricity bill. The lecturer opposes this point and says that as per recent analysis, fifteen million dollar is a cost of companies. Even though, they will increase ten times more prices, electricity bill will increase only one percent.
- generally, people live longer due to advanced technology 80
- Do you agree or disagree that all university students required to study history couse by no mater whether they are studying in another subjects 60
- it is better to work in group which have similar idea rather than which have different ideas than us 60
- workers should do one task on all work day rather than different task.agree or disagree 60
- people are very busy to do different things, so they do few things well. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 270, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ffect the reduction in use of coal ash. The lecturer effectively casts doubts on th...
^^^
Line 4, column 75, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f strict rules for material handling and storage will created, then consumers may...
^^
Line 4, column 90, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'create'
Suggestion: create
...for material handling and storage will created, then consumers may become concerned ab...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 140, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hen consumers may become concerned about buying recycle material like coal ash. T...
^^
Line 5, column 83, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...egulation would increase in the disposal and handling cost of the power station h...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, then, third, thirdly, as to, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1474.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 284.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19014084507 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54936386183 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538732394366 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.6875738452 49.2860985944 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.285714286 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2857142857 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78571428571 7.06452816374 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118963881705 0.272083759551 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0411451488143 0.0996497079465 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0701996379081 0.0662205650399 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0648279687868 0.162205337803 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0800198351931 0.0443174109184 181% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.3589403974 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.