Teachers are making efforts to enhance students’ interest in study. Which way do you think is the most effective way?
1) Applying technology in their teaching, such as computers or other mobile devices;
2) Encouraging students to study in groups;
3) Introducing how this subject would be useful in the future
In order to get students interest in their study, teachers nowadays try every means to make study more attractive. At the same time, the quality of the education should also be taken into consideration. Some people think that applying high-tech into classes or having a introduce of the subject could prompt students to study. However, from my point of view, organizing study groups among students could be more effective.
To begin with, motivating students to study in groups could raise their efficiency in study. The original intention of study group is to let the students to learn from each other. Even though there are peer pressure and competition between students, study groups could allow students to help each other in their study and set up a platform for them to cooperate with each other. When they meet some problems in the process of learning, they could discuss it together, share and exchange their opinions. In this situation, students could discover their gaps with other students in class. This would also reduce the job of the teacher to answer very basic questions that have already been incorporated in class. Therefore, studying in groups would strongly intensify students’ desire to study.
In addition, applying technology will actually have a negative effect on students’ study, because electronic devices like mobile phones and computers would act as distractions and enticements that prevent them from paying attention to their school work. Teenagers at this age possibly lack the self-control ability. During the classes, they would spend their time on chatting with their friends by social media, playing computer games or shopping on the Internet. As a result, this would lead to an awful academic performance of the students and run counter to the original purpose of using the electronic devices in class.
Finally, having an introduction about courses that how useful it will be in the future cannot impress the students a lot. Due to their young age, students will not easily believe in their teachers how significant it is to learn about this subject. They may have a stereotype that all the classes they must take is only used for their tasks. Only through their process of learning can they grow up and know about how important it is to study these school subjects will. Consequently, students could only find the pleasure of study by themselves, but not the dogma that impose restrictions on them.
In conclusion, based on the reasons that applying electronic devices could draw student’s attention away from their study and introducing how useful the subject is in the future cannot be understand by students. I extremely agree that encouraging students to study in groups could is the most effective way.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-22 | LAPLACE DEMON | 87 | view |
| 2020-10-01 | Lindsey0101 | 76 | view |
- Parents give their children primary school students weekly money to buy whatever they want Some people think this can cause bad habits and ideas about money in children while others think the opposite Which opinion do you agree with and why 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is a waste of money for governments to fund space travel or space exploration 76
- Teachers are making efforts to enhance students interest in study Which way do you think is the most effective way 1 Applying technology in their teaching such as computers or other mobile devices 2 Encouraging students to study in groups 3 Introducing ho 87
- Imagine that you have been given the opportunity to advise the government of a city or region area that you are familiar with to spend more money on ONE thing to benefit the city or region Which ONE of these do you believe would be the most beneficial for 94
- Nowadays many job interviewers and employers are looking for various additional sources of information to better understand a job applicant Which is the best way for the employers to better know the situation of a job applicant 1 Contacting previous emplo 96
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 269, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...plying high-tech into classes or having a introduce of the subject could prompt s...
^
Line 2, column 269, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...plying high-tech into classes or having a introduce of the subject could prompt students to...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 381, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to can'
Suggestion: to can
... Only through their process of learning can they grow up and know about how importa...
^^^
Line 10, column 282, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'be'
Suggestion: be
...aging students to study in groups could is the most effective way.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, consequently, finally, however, if, may, so, therefore, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 9.8082437276 245% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 52.1666666667 146% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2320.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 450.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15555555556 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6057793516 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62401068953 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522222222222 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 690.3 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8852323243 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.454545455 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4545454545 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.95454545455 5.45110844103 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353674780837 0.236089414692 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116855623657 0.076458572812 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0869490365614 0.0737576698707 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213834727848 0.150856017488 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0708487324141 0.0645574589148 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.