Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.
Teachers are a group of intellectual individuals who transfer knowledge to the next generations. There is no shortage of opinions on the topic of teachers being highly appreciated and valued in the past compared to the current situations. If I were forced to choose, I would agree with this statement without a doubt. I feel this way for a few main reasons which I would explore in the following paragraphs.
First and foremost, the number of qualified teachers available in the past is significantly lesser than these days. According to the past era, only those who are obtaining strong recommendation letters with high academic grades could get the opportunity to become a teacher. Hence, it was a great challenge to get the qualifications without significant potential in your particular field of expertise. And it was extremely rare to find a teacher in the past and students would rather pay a high price of tuition fee in order to get educated. In contrast, in the academic world today, some individuals happened to obtain any degree without any great effort by paying for the doctoral degree. As a result, there are countless teachers around us. It is certainly clear that the teachers in the past were mostly appreciated due to the rare count.
Secondly, the world has evolved into a very high-tech society with the great influence of the internet. The internet consists of various information and obtains greater intelligence than what teachers have today. Instead of taking classes from the teacher’s lecture, people could just press the search button on Google search to acquire whatever they are willing to learn. Hence, due to the existence of the more convenient internet searching ability, students would rather study alone without being taught by teachers. Drawing from my own experience, the lectures available in a physics class are quite restricted to the brief concept of the theory but the more detailed information was usually left out due to the time limit in class. Besides, sometimes teachers would not be able to answer your answers immediately as they might not know the answers too. As a result, we would just solve this problem by browsing the internet which contains an abundance of research papers available online to conserve time. Thus, surfing the internet might be more useful than the teachers’ assistance in academics.
In light of the above-mentioned, I strongly believe that teachers nowadays are not cherished as much as before because of the great number of teachers available and the profound influence of the internet.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-14 | Vivian Chang | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-26 | Crash | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-25 | can111 | 60 | view |
| 2023-02-14 | reza_fattahi | 70 | view |
| 2023-01-06 | minammah | 73 | view |
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long 70
- Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays 78
- Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave 70
- The opinions of celebrities such as famous entertainers and athletes are more important to younger people than they are to older people 90
- It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, hence, if, second, secondly, so, thus, i feel, in contrast, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2156.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 421.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12114014252 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82832140045 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548693586698 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 663.3 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5553725807 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.8 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.05 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.45110844103 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305185099142 0.236089414692 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0820653621617 0.076458572812 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0693560652347 0.0737576698707 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158677534504 0.150856017488 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0259791432756 0.0645574589148 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.