With the advancements in technology in our society, people can use many different ways to communicate with each other. In this case, some people like to talk on the phone, while others prefer texting over calling. I favor texting over calling for these reasons: I am able to double-check what I am saying, and I can communicate with others at my own pace.
First, it is easier to communicate with people living in different time zones through text messages. This is because, unlike calling, texting does not need to be done at the same time. This feature can benefit both multinational organizations and individuals as companies can communicate with branches in different countries, while individuals can maintain a bond with their loved ones. My personal experience is an example of this. When my sister had to move to the US for her studies, we were all very sad and worried about her. Due to this, our family made it a habit to call her every day and make sure she was okay. However, we had to call her in the middle of the night due to the time difference, which was very exhausting for my parents. After a week of communicating this way, my sister suggested that we should just text her instead of calling. This made it very easy for us to communicate as we would leave her a message when we were free, and she would reply when she woke up.
Furthermore, one is able to be more time-efficient by communicating through text messages. Since a phone call is real-time and communication has to be done at the same time, one has to focus only on the phone call and therefore are not able to do any other things. On the other hand, one is able to perform other tasks while communicating at the same, since it is not real-time, and there is a time gap between sending texts and the other person replying. Therefore, it is possible to do something else aside from communicating with that person. For example, I am usually busy with assignments and studying all the time. However, this does not stop me from talking to my friends since I am able to text them during study breaks without the burden of focusing my entire attention on the conversation.
In conclusion, I believe that texting is more convenient than calling because when texting, the possibility of miscommunication is greatly decreased, and it is possible to communicate at your own pace.
- Technology has made it easier for people to communicate with each other Some people prefer to talk over the phone while others prefer to communicate through text messages What type of communication do you prefer and why 70
- Technology has made it easier for people to communicate with each other Some people prefer to talk over the phone while others prefer to communicate through text messages What type of communication do you prefer and why 73
- Some people think that parents should plan their children s leisure time carefully Other people believe Those children should decide for themselves how to spend their free time which idea do you agree with 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 68, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...chnology in our society, people can use many different ways to communicate with each other. In...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...municate with others at my own pace. First, it is easier to communicate with ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd she would reply when she woke up. Furthermore, one is able to be more time...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntire attention on the conversation. In conclusion, I believe that texting is...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1955.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 416.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69951923077 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51620172871 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82316661557 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 630.9 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9471835322 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.894736842 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8947368421 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63157894737 5.45110844103 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346172863569 0.236089414692 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114117652949 0.076458572812 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100416768588 0.0737576698707 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221046140574 0.150856017488 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.145683530239 0.0645574589148 226% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.