Telling the truth is important consideration for people in all the situation,agree or not
Buiding stronger networking with people always requires careful deliberations which often people tend to ignore. A successful relationship needs a person's efforts and genuineness. Should people realize the consequences of dishonesty in our day to day dealings, they are wondering over it scrupulously. In this regard, it is said that truthfulness creates strength and honesty in relationships. There are various schools of thought are among people on this issue which some of them would take eye to eye with it while others take issue with it. In my opinion, telling the truth is always the right and most significant consideration in all relationships, and in ensuing lines, I will elaborate on the most outstanding and compelling ground.
Being truthful helps people to maintain good relations especially in arduous situations, where the probabilities of fights get higher. Living in a society always requires humans to keep their relations smooth with others but sometimes hiding the truth leads to situations when others get angry as they do not know the facts. My son's experience is a compelling example of this. Cricket is a famous game in my country in which case lthe player hits the ball with the bat and runs to take scores. Last summer, my son was playing a cricket game with his friends in the main street. Suddenly, we heard a sharp sound and it was not difficult to tell that someone's house window was broken. It was my neighbor, a grumpy single mother, whose window children had broken after hitting with the ball. Children were so terrified because of my neighbor's reaction that no one was ready to accept that whose fault was that. My son came forward and accepted his mistake that gave courage to all his friends and they started to repent of their action too and asked that lady's forgiveness. Thankfully my neighbor calmed down and felt happy and appreciate parents instead of her loss. If children hadn't spoken the truth, it would have lead to huge arguments in my neighborhood. It is certainly clear to see why truth plays an integral role in avoiding arguments and building good terms with people.
Telling the truth has the power to develop trust which ultimately results in strengthening the relationship. It is not easy to gain trust but if people are being fair with each other in their day-to-day dealings they may win over others' hearts and show them their truthfulness. For instance, last year I joined a new company. From the beginning, I tried to be always sincere with my job and didn’t show dishonesty in any of my work by telling no lie. Later, my colleague got jealous of me and he tried to complain against me multiple times but my boss always favors me because of my sincerity and truthfulness.
In light of the above-mentioned reasons, I am convinced that truth is the best policy in all situations. As it will not only prevent the arguments, but also build trust amongst people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1163, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hadn't
...ir parents instead of her loss. If they hadnt spoken the truth, it would have lead to...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 124, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y in all situations. As it will not only prevent the arguments, but also build tr...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, then, while, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 61.0 43.0788530466 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2405.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 495.0 407.700716846 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85858585859 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71684168287 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77081883136 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 278.0 212.727598566 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561616161616 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 709.2 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7863340794 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.208333333 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.45110844103 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164817999116 0.236089414692 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.045371287298 0.076458572812 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046614721295 0.0737576698707 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102030810689 0.150856017488 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0408280116661 0.0645574589148 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 86.8835125448 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.