There are two companies, which are both willing to offer you a job with the same rate of pay.
One offers interesting and challenging projects but gives almost no vacation days, and the job of another company does not seem like interesting or challenging but with more vacation days.
Which one do you prefer?
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Currently, society has witnessed an unprecedented accumulation of material affluence, thus freshmen are afforded with multiple choices, which baffles them in varieties of dimensions. Therefore, in order to adapt to the hectic life, a bunch of freshmen opt to participate in a one-week orientation or introduction program, while others tend to meet regularly with a senior student. Personally speaking, I prefer to meet with a senior student regularly instead of taking part in an introduction and there are a couple of reasons to account for my view.
To start with, since the meeting with a senior student is merely geared toward me, the senior student is capable of affording me with sufficient and copious suggestions according to my major and some other conditions. Conversely, the introduction or orientation is held toward a group of freshmen from divergent majors or departments, hence amassing information in the lecture is not effective enough compared to the meeting. For instance, once I was a freshman in Tianjin University, I was curious about every event held in my school, including the orientation geared toward the whole students. However, the orientation really dampened my enthusiasm about such kind of activities, since what was displayed had nothing to do with my major, let alone enabling me to adjust or succeed in the university life. This example illuminates that due to the individuals the introduction gear toward, it is not capable of offering useful information conducive to get accustomed to the university life effectively, while the meeting with a senior student affords us with the capability to gather specific information and adjust our schedule to fit into the university lives shortly after entering the university.
What’s more, having regular meeting with a senior is also a terrific approach to help me tackle newly-emerging problems. Shortly after entering the university, an increasing number of problems are likely to emerge, especially in the situation without the help from my parents or guardians. With a senior student who is proficient in resolving these kinds of problems, it is not only conducive to address the issue but also beneficial to boost my productivity. Meanwhile, due to the difference existing between lifestyles, the psychological problems confronted with me can merely be addressed by the direct and straightforward talking. Listening to my talking, a senior student is likely to share his or her own experience as a consolation which helps me to alleviate my depression.
Admittedly, attending the orientation held by the school also has its own perks. For instance, gathering information related to other majors can expand my outlook, instead of leading a parochial outlook. Nevertheless, having a headstart in university is of pivotal significance in achieve success, thus amass information targeted at my own major from a senior student with the same major enables me to lay a solid foundation to the future success.
In a nutshell, meeting with a senior student with plentiful experience is the optimal approach to get accustomed to the life in the university, since it is much more efficient to gather information related with my major from him or her and deal with the problems existing in my life.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Competition between friends usually has negative impacts on friendship. 91
- workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long 73
- Ambitious dreams or realistic dreams 73
- University should allocate funds to increase professors salaries so as to improve the quality of education 76
- What is the most important factor affecting the lasting time of a friendship 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, hence, however, if, look, nevertheless, really, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, kind of, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 96.0 52.1666666667 184% => OK
Nominalization: 26.0 8.0752688172 322% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2757.0 1977.66487455 139% => OK
No of words: 522.0 407.700716846 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2816091954 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77988695657 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13672676052 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 258.0 212.727598566 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494252873563 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 886.5 618.680645161 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.1344086022 149% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.2176954993 48.9658058833 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 162.176470588 100.406767564 162% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.7058823529 20.6045352989 149% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.94117647059 5.45110844103 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0587465239665 0.236089414692 25% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0222234259631 0.076458572812 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0164297989984 0.0737576698707 22% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0388716399597 0.150856017488 26% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0103580169399 0.0645574589148 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 11.7677419355 160% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 58.1214874552 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.1575268817 159% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.94 10.9000537634 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.01818996416 119% => OK
difficult_words: 145.0 86.8835125448 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.0537634409 139% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.