There is a drastic contrast between different types of people on whether people perform well when they do one task at a time or doing multi tasks and perform bad. While, it is contradicted by many that people people could be able to do different things but they do very few things well. Personally, I inclined to believe that people do perform well when they do and are focused in one job at a time. I will state some strong reasons to support my belief.
In my opinion, the first and the most important reason is that people should know by now that our society is aiming for quality in all fields of life. In majority of cases even though we might find what we are looking for, still we should look for the best quality of that in order to get our fullest satisfaction. For instance, when I was in University, I was able to find all the materials that I needed for my research papers, but I was aiming all the time for a good quality of work. Spending all my time working on that matter, gave me a good grate. I figure out that how important is to reach quality in something that you do.
Because of this, it is very important not only to be able to work in multitasks, but do thing with high quality as well.
Furthermore, another reason which has to be considered is that nowadays people live a busy life and they want to reach out, and do as much as they can in order to meet the speed of the society life, and development that are happening. Trying to integrate as soon as they can. If they do not move with that speed, they might fall behind. So, they rather go without thinking to much just complete what is needed in general term than slow down and check the quality of the thing that they have worked for. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by University of Toronto has asserted that people who worked fast did not have a high quality of work. They fell to reach standard requirements for that particular work.
To sum up, I am to a large extent on the belief that people should work not just fast and do many different things, but work to reach a high quality as well.
There is a drastic contrast between different types of people on whether people perform well when they do one task at a time or doing multi tasks and perform bad. While, it is contradicted by many that people people could be able to do different things but they do very few things well. Personally, I inclined to believe that people do perform well when they do and are focused in one job at a time. I will state some strong reasons to support my belief.
In my opinion, the first and the most important reason is that people should know by now that our society is aiming for quality in all fields of life. In majority of cases even though we might find what we are looking for, still we should look for the best quality of that in order to get our fullest satisfaction. For instance, when I was in University, I was able to find all the materials that I needed for my research papers, but I was aiming all the time for a good quality of work. Spending all my time working on that matter, gave me a good grate. I figure out that how important is to reach quality in something that you do.
Because of this, it is very important not only to be able to work in multitasks, but do thing with high quality as well.
Furthermore, another reason which has to be considered is that nowadays people live a busy life and they want to reach out, and do as much as they can in order to meet the speed of the society life, and development that are happening. Trying to integrate as soon as they can. If they do not move with that speed, they might fall behind. So, they rather go without thinking to much just complete what is needed in general term than slow down and check the quality of the thing that they have worked for. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by University of Toronto has asserted that people who worked fast did not have a high quality of work. They fell to reach standard requirements for that particular work.
To sum up, I am to a large extent on the belief that people should work not just fast and do many different things, but work to reach a high quality as well.
- The author states about the three kinds of damages caused by the " let it burn" policy. As opposed to, the lecturer who counter- argues that viewpoint trying to prove that these damages do not seem convincing.First and foremost, the writer mentions that t 60
- TPO 30 73
- There has been discussion about the ethanol fuel, whether it is an alternative to gasoline in the United States. The lecturer argues that the usage of ethanol is going to be very good alternative. While the author contends that it is not a good replacemen 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- TPO 49 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 203, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: people
... While, it is contradicted by many that people people could be able to do different things bu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 374, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...nd. So, they rather go without thinking to much just complete what is needed in ge...
^^
Line 8, column 94, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...people should work not just fast and do many different things, but work to reach a high qualit...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, look, so, still, well, while, as to, for instance, in general, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.0286738351 190% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1713.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 397.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.31486146096 4.8611393121 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46372701284 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33685009177 2.67179642975 87% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.476070528967 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 531.0 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.6204665013 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.764705882 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3529411765 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.82352941176 5.45110844103 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.461620925169 0.236089414692 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.16535852676 0.076458572812 216% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.22672709403 0.0737576698707 307% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.277782131505 0.150856017488 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.28292521199 0.0645574589148 438% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 11.7677419355 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 58.1214874552 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.01 10.9000537634 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.0 8.01818996416 87% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 86.8835125448 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.