Think critically about the following statement. A universal language should replace all languages. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of a universal language.
Language is an important media for people to communicate and socialize with each other. We communicate ideas and understand each other with the help of words. The variety of different languages ranging from national and traditional language is astonishing. However, recently some people proposed that one universal language should be established and would replace all the other languages. Although it may have some advantages, I believe that unifying languages into a universal one will erode the cultural diversity of human’s world.
Unifying language is beneficial for common standards. People who haven’t acquired any languages knowledge will start to learn the same language. Newborn babies, toddlers and children from different countries will start learn the same grammars and language structure. Common standards can also happen in the workplace. For example, every job advertisement will require candidates to possess only one universal language. Language will no longer be a barrier for everyone. People will be more confident to travel, study or work outside their home countries because they don’t have to learn foreign language.
However, universal language will potentially erode nation’s cultural and historical value. Most of the times, language had been established before a country was established. Therefore nation’s language has rich intrinsic value about the origin of a country. National languages are also a form of collective memory of a society. If universal language replaces them, it is like forcing people to abandon their nation’s history and memory.
Moreover, national languages are deeply attached with the description of each country and region. One country might have several traditional languages that able to describe its unique cultural elements. For example, Indonesia have more than 100 traditional languages that able to provide knowledge about its region’s values, arts and other social norms.
In conclusion, despite the major benefit of universal language, integrating languages into one will definitely harm the country’s cultural and historical values. So I believe that reducing the variety of languages into one is not a wise action.
- Investigations made at laboratories in the various parts of the world indicate that apes are capable of understanding language and using linguistic responses at the level of young children. just because these animals do not have the physical apparatus for 80
- The widespread use of the Internet has given people access to information on a level never experienced before. How does this increase in the availability of information influence life in today's world? 70
- The best teacher is one who is very knowledgeable about the subject matter Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 93
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statements: students learn better when they are not threatened with possible failure. Use reasons and specific examples to support your opinion. 10
- Salmon a fish prized for both food and sport has a complex life cycle After spending several years in the ocean adult salmon travel back to the freshwater streams where they were originally spawned to lay their eggs the females bury the eggs under the san 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 92, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'languages'' or 'language's'?
Suggestion: languages'; language's
...s. People who haven't acquired any languages knowledge will start to learn the same ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 180, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ished before a country was established. Therefore nation's language has rich intrins...
^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'therefore', 'for example', 'in conclusion']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.245569620253 0.229887763892 107% => OK
Verbs: 0.151898734177 0.158761421928 96% => OK
Adjectives: 0.124050632911 0.0866891130778 143% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0379746835443 0.046263068375 82% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0278481012658 0.0685040099705 41% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0962025316456 0.118717715034 81% => OK
Participles: 0.0278481012658 0.0351676179071 79% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.97602050094 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Infinitives: 0.020253164557 0.0309702414327 65% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0708860759494 0.0887237588012 80% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0329113924051 0.0209618222197 157% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00759493670886 0.0139019557991 55% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2232.0 2387.08602151 94% => OK
No of words: 328.0 408.028673835 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.80487804878 5.86048508987 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.48200974243 95% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.481707317073 0.338922669872 142% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.414634146341 0.251872472559 165% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.323170731707 0.174417080927 185% => Too many words length more than 7 chars.
words length more than 8 chars: 0.213414634146 0.112833075102 189% => Too many words length more than 8 chars.
Word Length SD: 2.97602050094 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545731707317 0.524397521467 104% => OK
Word variations: 58.2604453868 59.2087087015 98% => OK
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6684587814 106% => OK
Sentence length: 14.9090909091 20.5533526081 73% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.2555652191 48.84282405 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.454545455 120.699889404 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9090909091 20.5533526081 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.409090909091 0.644075263715 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.54480286738 36% => OK
Readability: 56.3725055432 45.7405998639 123% => OK
Elegance: 1.6976744186 1.45489161554 117% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.396495659396 0.300154397459 132% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.114783929395 0.103427244359 111% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0890537129931 0.0752933317313 118% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.501287120148 0.497263757937 101% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.121673764962 0.151897553556 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140182948608 0.114077575197 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0751608744112 0.0781384742642 96% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.238071660748 0.336927656856 71% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0467612826018 0.067059652881 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.254033582834 0.210909579961 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.086818778487 0.0618886996521 140% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8870967742 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.86379928315 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.91756272401 203% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 8.0 8.42114695341 95% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 2.4623655914 122% => OK
Neutral topic words: 10.0 2.75985663082 362% => OK
Total topic words: 21.0 13.6433691756 154% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.