in times of an economic crises, in which area should governments reduce their spending?
1- scientific researches
2-art
3-park and public gardens
The question is whether government should reduce its spending in arts, scientific researches or parks and public gardens when it is struggling with economic crises. Everyone in consideration to his private view point may maintain a specific direction toward this issue. Some believe that the state never dwindle its budget in park fields because without an appropriate green space, people may become depressed while others have a conviction that spending money on scientific researches or producing artworks would be beneficial, so the rulers should not manipulate their budget. I am unanimous with the latter group and the next paragraphs will vastly elucidate my vantage point through three salient reasons:
To begin with, the crucial task in economic crises is that businessmen, sociologists, economists and other types of researchers evaluate the society and attempt to find the main root of trouble. Without them and their efforts, the government will not be able to be recovered itself. Besides, nowadays, the technology has kept marching forward and communities are competing with each other to achieve prosperity in a variety of fields; hence, stopping scientific researches may have destructive consequence. Needless to say through new discoveries and scientific projects, a country would gain financial profits. For instance, with investing and developing in the computer section, the engineers will tender the newest ideas or even better they will try to produce most up-dated tablets or cell phone; as a result, money would be returned into country.
In addition, one should not forget that it is the rulers' task to assist people for having a happy spirit in the hard conditions. Reducing the art spending will also have negative impacts on human beings. During hardship, people need to do activities which could help them to overcome the difficulties. Going a painting exhibition or music concert cause damaged people to obtain the sense of peace. I remember when my father was a bankrupt and he was very upset and even depressed. One day my older brother offered him to participate in a painting workshop. My father had natural talent of painting and then participating in the mentioned workshop could revive him again. My purpose of saying the aforementioned memory was that art projects can be used as a natural drug in treating people in economic crises and they should not be eliminated.
Moreover, every society have several parks or green space; therefore, instead of spending huge money on building new parks, the state should ask humans to behave with those existent green spaces adequately until the financial problem be solved. They just have to attempt not to harm trees, seat or other facilities and throw their trashes on the ground.
To sum up, this conclusion could be drawn that in my view, the rulers must reduce park budget because using existent resources is more logical than stopping projects which will solve economic crisis.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-04 | precious oseghale | 76 | view |
- which one is better?Participating in the class and sharing idea or sitting and listening to the teacher and taking note. 76
- do you agree or disagree? people gain more happiness from their jobs than their social life or not. 76
- Tpo43 83
- Do you agree or disagree The teachers had a greater influence on the young people in the past than they do today 95
- Do you agree or disagree One can learn a lot about a person from the types of friends this person has 92
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, hence, if, may, moreover, so, then, therefore, while, for instance, in addition, as a result, in my view, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 9.8082437276 234% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2501.0 1977.66487455 126% => OK
No of words: 476.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25420168067 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67091256922 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71035680342 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 277.0 212.727598566 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581932773109 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 763.2 618.680645161 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.7965597513 48.9658058833 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.631578947 100.406767564 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0526315789 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.63157894737 5.45110844103 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200747631381 0.236089414692 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0581564647284 0.076458572812 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0895792000587 0.0737576698707 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110243093374 0.150856017488 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0718633649723 0.0645574589148 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 11.7677419355 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 10.9000537634 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 86.8835125448 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.