In today's world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.
Today we live in a fast-paced society. It is thought by some people that since we do not have time to lost we should work as quickly as we could even we may make mistakes. This essay will discuss why it is, in fact, people should work slowly and make sure everything look accurate.
First and foremost, contrary to the belief that working quickly is crucial to move forward and accomplish your assigment, evidence has shown that people who worked quickly would spend more time to finish their work, rather than people who worked slowly. Many people who work fast have a higher chance to make mistakes. They would spend the rest of the time correcting those mistakes, but sometimes those mistakes could lead to other major mistakes, which is very hard to be solved. For example, statistics have revealed that 78 percent of fast working people have had caused other complex and unkown problems that took in average 2 days to solve them. Compare that to slow working people who finish their job in time. If people would be able to work slowly and correct their mistakes, they would not loose their time with major unexpected problems.
Furthermore, it is essential to consider the fact that the quality of work is more valued nowadays. With the development of technology and the usage of computers, people's jobs are becoming more easy, but the demand for a great quality is significantly increased. Therefore, people should focus more on providing good jobs rather than working fact and with a poor quality. For instance, my experience is a compelling example of this. Five years ago, I worked for a company where all employes had to be productive on their jobs. If we made a mistake, we had to corrected right away because we could not go through to the next step. All those steps that we had to follow, allowed us to work slowly and make sure everything was correct, so we could continue further. That actually, was a great way that the company had chosen to get a higher quality of the product at the end of the production process. That is why I beliefe that working slowly and correct the mistakes as you move slowly to the next step is the best way to get a good job at the end.
All in all, I believe that working slowly and correct mistakes is better because people would save time and provide a valuable work.
- Tpo 10 Do you agree with statement that playing computer games is a waste of time Children should not be allowed to play them 70
- tpo 10 Question Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they respond to the specific points made reading passage declining the population of sea otter in the western coast of North America from California to Alaska 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The opinions of celebrities such as famous entertainers and athletes are more important to younger people than they are to older people Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 66
- TPO 5 Summarise the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage 80
- tpo 10 Question Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they respond to the specific points made reading passage declining the population of sea otter in the western coast of North America from California to Alaska 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 801, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
... correct their mistakes, they would not loose their time with major unexpected proble...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, furthermore, if, look, may, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1911.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 413.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62711864407 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37586658097 2.67179642975 89% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.486682808717 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 594.0 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7901692507 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.578947368 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7368421053 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21052631579 5.45110844103 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.343636686263 0.236089414692 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112651513195 0.076458572812 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0824354750193 0.0737576698707 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226590901595 0.150856017488 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00834543721865 0.0645574589148 13% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.