Needless to say, working is unavoidable in every human life. Hence, since time immemorial, an inevitable question that always has been such a hot matter of debate is whether it is more efficient to work quickly with low accuracy or work slowly and meticulously, meaning with the highest possible precision. Although some people think that working rapidly, even with low accuracy, is more essential today, I believe otherwise, maintaining that one has to work with proper pace and the highest precision, especially in today's sophisticated world. In what follows, I will delve into the most persuasive reasons to substantiate my perspective.
Without a doubt, the most consequential reason in this regard is the extensiveness of the market in every job. Nowadays, every job has so many opponents who offer the same services. If people want to survive in today's markets, they must be able to compete with their counterparts. One of the most significant contexts of competition is the accuracy and quality of the offered services. A company may provide high-quality products at a low pace and high cost but still, keep its customers satisfied. However, offering faulty products, which usually results from working quickly and without adequate precision, never provides the opportunity for that company to thrive and prosper. Therefore, this reason clearly manifests the importance of working slowly and correctly.
Although the previous reason is the first one crossing the mind at first glance, there is another remarkable point deserving some words here, which is concerned with money. It is undeniable that money is an essential factor in every enterprise and job. When a company works with high accuracy, it has no choice but to work slowly. During the early years, it may not be able to sell so many products or make adequate contracts with clients; consequently, it can not gain a satisfying amount of money. Nonetheless, thanks to the high quality of their products, they will have permanent consumers in the long run. As a result, implementing this policy will not only compensate for the shortage of money acquisition during the early years but also make the company surpass its rivals in terms of revenue.
All in all, many people are in favor of working quickly and carelessly; nevertheless, the foregoing reasons lead us to conclude that the output's quality and precision are much more momentous than the pace of the work. This is because of survival in the market and making money.
- When a new technological device becomes available Some people buy it right away while others will wait until many have acquired it Which do you prefer 90
- Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the well being of the societies and environments in which they operate Others believe that the only responsibility of corporations provided they operate within the law is to make as mu
- The following appeared in a memo from the vice president of a food distribution company with food storage warehouses in several cities Recently we signed a contract with the Fly Away Pest Control Company to provide pest control services at our fast food w 68
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to live in one town or city all your life than to move from one place to another Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 138, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'outputs'' or 'output's'?
Suggestion: outputs'; output's
...ng reasons lead us to conclude that the outputs quality and precision are much more mom...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, still, therefore, as to, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2093.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 407.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14250614251 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81746090529 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542997542998 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 657.9 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.0570408336 48.9658058833 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.157894737 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4210526316 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.52631578947 5.45110844103 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241202690061 0.236089414692 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0669567452305 0.076458572812 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0708016083672 0.0737576698707 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156674204072 0.150856017488 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.06416337055 0.0645574589148 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.