In today’s world, it is very important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than works slowly and make sure that everything is correct
It goes without saying that in today’s sophisticated world we live in, progression technology lead to increasing speed changing in different aspects. Some people believe that following these conditions is not a good idea, so they prefer to work slowly with more confident. Some others mention that high speed progression have affected their life; thus they will to comply these circumstances and work quickly and risk making mistakes. When it comes to me, I agree with the latter opinion. The rationale behind this idea will be elaborated upon and exemplified in the ensuing paragraphs by focusing on two fundamental reasons.
One reason coming to mind at first is that people become experienced by working quickly and risking makes a mistake. In fact, they examine different conditions and get information about them. If one strategy and idea do not work for the condition, results will be beneficial for the latter condition. For instance, merchants who send their products to different cities for attracting consumers not only work quickly but also risk making mistakes. Some cities deny their goods while others accept them. In both situations, because becoming experience, they gain profit.
Second, being sure to their abilities, people work quickly and risk making mistakes. As a matter of fact, it is a loop between having self-confidence and risking make mistakes. If persons are confident, they work quickly and risky. During times their confidence will be increase when they get good results. So they have the more reliance, they work the more quickly and unsafe. In other words, they become strong at challenging with problems, so they access their goals. For example, Steve Jobs who was the most popular entrepreneur in the entire world had this characteristic in his life. During one decade he had not only substantial successes but also significant defeats. He never became disappointed because always he believed his abilities.
To put it in a nutshell, taking all of the aforementioned ideas into consideration, it can be safely assume that working quickly and risking make mistakes is very important for managing our lives in today’s sophisticated world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-09-03 | fereshteh86 | 76 | view |
- decreasing population of yellow cedar trees 68
- using burning mirrors as a weapon by ancient Greeks 60
- Decreasing the yellow cedar population 68
- using burning mirrors by ancient Greeks 60
- Children rely too much on the technology, like computers, smartphones, video games for fun and entertainment. Playing simpler toys or playing outside with friends would be better for children’ s development. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 33, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...es. To put it in a nutshell, taking all of the aforementioned ideas into consideration...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 155, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...orking quickly and risking make mistakes is very important for managing our lives...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, in fact, as a matter of fact, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1848.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 348.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31034482759 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86961798136 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574712643678 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.631886237 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.0 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5714285714 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61904761905 5.45110844103 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305365095232 0.236089414692 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.088728664703 0.076458572812 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10524284555 0.0737576698707 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218977739342 0.150856017488 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.079892693167 0.0645574589148 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.