Nowadays, it is so important to do tasks correctly. If you do jobs correctly, you would gain success in your career. Some people think that in today's world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct, others disagree. In my view, it is better to do tasks correct rather doing quickly with risk for two important reasons.
First, some mistakes are hard to make up. In some jobs, there are some tasks that you do not allow to make mistakes because the consequences are very high and cost so much. For example, when I worked in a factory two years ago, I had a friend who was so talented and worked so quickly. One day I remember that he should set up the CNG machine in order to make an important part. That part was a crucial one and that work must be done in a proper way. My friend took responsibility but made a mistake because he did not pay attention very well and that part being ruined. That mistake cost very much to our factory and some producing machines stopped for three days. The factory manager fired my friend because of that mistake. This experience taught me that we must do jobs correctly even it takes a lot of time.
Second, if you work with more attention, you can find better a method to do a task. Some tasks need more attention and if you think well you can find methods that do the task more easily with less time. For instance, when I was hired in a factory a couple of years ago, I had an important rule in designing a new producing section. I tried so hard for that project and spent so much time to design the best machine allocation. But when the job was done, the result was a success because I put so much thought into that project. From this, I realized that it is better to think more when you try to do a job properly.
In sum, I believe that it is better to do tasks correct rather doing quickly with risk. Not only some mistakes are hard to make up, but also with more thought, you can do jobs better. We all must pay more attention to our jobs and do task with more attention.
- In 1938 an archaeologist in Iraq acquired a set of clay jars that had been excavated two years earlier by villagers constructing a railroad line. The vessel was about 2,200 years old. Each clay jay contained a copper cylinder surrounding an iron rod. The 3
- TOEFL T P O 21 - Integrated Writing Task 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The extended family (grandparents, cousins, aunts, and uncles) is less important now than it was in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Genetic modification, a process used to change an organism’s genes and hence its characteristics, is now being used to improve trees. Through genetic modification, it is possible to create trees that produce more fruits, grow faster, or withstand advers 60
- Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 100, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'making'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: making
...re are some tasks that you do not allow to make mistakes because the consequences are v...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 435, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a proper way" with adverb for "proper"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... crucial one and that work must be done in a proper way. My friend took responsibility but made...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, well, for example, for instance, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1704.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 399.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.27067669173 4.8611393121 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25720914448 2.67179642975 84% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.443609022556 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 532.8 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.6716535568 48.9658058833 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.4545454545 100.406767564 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1363636364 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.45110844103 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279845623874 0.236089414692 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0934748196597 0.076458572812 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.156518967962 0.0737576698707 212% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208790081544 0.150856017488 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.150501608294 0.0645574589148 233% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.8 11.7677419355 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 58.1214874552 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.1575268817 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.19 10.9000537634 66% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.35 8.01818996416 79% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 86.8835125448 53% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.