TOPIC # 54 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? One should never judge a person by external appearances.

I partially agree and disagree with claim that one should never judge a person by external appearance. In my opinion, it is depending on the situations that external appearance whether will affected or not.I feel this way for two main reasons which I will explore in the following essay.

First of all, don't judge the external appearance to the knowledge, capability of the person. A good monument or artwork come from the uneven structured rock, which craving the rock. In addition, many scholars, scientists, veterans were looking awkwardly physical appearance. For instance, A.P.J. Abdul kalam who is one of the pioneer scientist in INDIA. He brought from a low-middle-class. He has not even proper dresses to wear, not have minimum food to survival, not have money to educate for himself. Then he started to do part-time work and study himself. Now, He is played one of the key role in the Space Organisation and also appointed for the President of India. In summary, sometimes don't linkup to the knowledge and capability of the person.

Secondly, sometimes external appearance will interpret the innate behavior and character. Generally, The external appearance will reflect the inward personality. That's-why the interviewer will make a decision within one minute whether to select the candidate or not. The neighbor son experience is a compelling example of this. He is very rigid and rigorous attitude, not taken studies seriously. Recently, He had taken an interview for applying a job. But, the interviewer quit him. After he come up the reason that his external appearance confronted his attitude and behavior towards the work. For this reason, I strongly believe that external appearance is to be conform in this type of the situation.

In conclusion, I partially agree and disagree with the argument. This is because innate capabilities willn't judge by external appearance and whereas innate behavior and character will reflect outward appearance.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 122, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... external appearance. In my opinion, it is depending on the situations that external appeara...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 191, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'affect'
Suggestion: affect
...s that external appearance whether will affected or not.I feel this way for two main rea...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 207, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: I
...appearance whether will affected or not.I feel this way for two main reasons whic...
^
Line 3, column 15, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...n the following essay. First of all, dont judge the external appearance to the kn...
^^^^
Line 3, column 125, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... person. A good monument or artwork come from the uneven structured rock, which c...
^^
Line 3, column 402, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ught from a low-middle-class. He has not even proper dresses to wear, not have mi...
^^
Line 3, column 653, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Organisation and also appointed for the President of India. In summary, sometime...
^^
Line 3, column 697, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...esident of India. In summary, sometimes dont linkup to the knowledge and capability ...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, look, second, secondly, so, then, whereas, for instance, i feel, in addition, in conclusion, in summary, first of all, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 52.1666666667 65% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1655.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 314.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27070063694 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9050958207 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56050955414 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.2210847962 48.9658058833 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.2272727273 100.406767564 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.2727272727 20.6045352989 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.81818181818 5.45110844103 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.88709677419 246% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197032176613 0.236089414692 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0596202308438 0.076458572812 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104150511102 0.0737576698707 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147910582027 0.150856017488 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0926191055362 0.0645574589148 143% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 11.7677419355 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 58.1214874552 84% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.69 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.