Topic Some people like to eat in restaurants and at foodstands others like to eat at home Which do you prefer Give reasons and examples to support your choice

Essay topics:

Topic: Some people like to eat in restaurants and at foodstands, others like to eat at home. Which do you prefer? Give reasons and examples to support your choice.

Everyone has their preference for eating styles and places, which may influence their life's other aspects. I believe that having meals out of home is beneficial for me. I feel this way for three main reasons, and I will develop these ideas in the following paragraphs.

To begin with, if individuals dine out, they will save time, which signifies that they can expend hours for essential things such as studying. preparing the supper requires a lot of time from people, so they become too time-deprived to accomplish important matters. For instance, I virtually spend two hours cooking, thus I devote less time to learning, compared to the days when I go to the cafeteria. On the one hand, I only expend thirty minutes to go to the restaurant and devour. Consequently, I am available to concentrate on my lesson for a long time without wasting much time to cook because I am capable of conserving ninety minutes every day.

Secondly, most eateries make appetizing foods, which means consumers can enjoy these delicious foods, in turn, improve their emotional state. There are a ton of people including me who constantly struggle to prepare fine cuisine. Therefore, they usually eat disgusting foods by virtue of their impoverished cooking skill, which may heavily affect their daily moods. For example, I start getting anxious whenever I eat unpleasant foods. Eventually, I end up ruining everything due to eating a distasteful meal. Nonetheless, individuals who are horrible at cooking can visit eating places in order to circumvent such unnecessary problems.

Finally, individuals can save their money efficiently since some type of dishes are cheaper than cooking made at the house. most people say that buying from shops is expensive. However, we should allow for costs that are utilized for cooking at the private accommodation. Livelihood should afford food materials, devices of the kitchen, and the cost of electricity that is employed for cooking. For instance, my roommate cooks at our dormitory while I regularly purchase snacks from shops. In fact, my expense used for meals is less than my companion by three hundred dollars per month. The more time elapses, the bigger discrepancy will be. As a result, I can store my additional currency by frequently dining out.

In summation, I am of the opinion that feeding on foods bought from shops or restaurants can be advantageous for me. this is because I will save time and money, and have pleasant meals.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-04-14 DaVa20011218 80 view
2020-04-14 DaVa20011218 80 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user DaVa20011218 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 144, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Preparing
... for essential things such as studying. preparing the supper requires a lot of time from ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 125, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Most
...cheaper than cooking made at the house. most people say that buying from shops is ex...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, however, if, may, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, i feel, in fact, such as, as a result, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2070.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 407.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.085995086 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79263379163 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616707616708 0.524837075471 118% => OK
syllable_count: 642.6 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.8666205453 48.9658058833 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.25 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9583333333 20.6045352989 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.45833333333 5.45110844103 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116654715355 0.236089414692 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0343707705167 0.076458572812 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0364326554416 0.0737576698707 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0663537922441 0.150856017488 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0446914109289 0.0645574589148 69% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.