Being a part of social activities and sports is mandatory for each person. Becoming healthier and more gregarious make each human to learn these activities in their lives. Many people believe that these issues have been included at universities and colleges; however, the others have the reverse idea. From my point of view, students should learn these activities outside of universities due to two crucial reasons that I am going to imply them in the following discussion.
First of all, learning knowledge is the main point for each student attending university. Authorities should build many faculties in which include library and laboratory to encourage students to learn more knowledge and change the atmosphere of universities to be more scientific. Professors and lecturers are keen on enlightening their students. For example, I actively participated in many of my classes; consequently, I could earn a good score in many of my courses. As a result, I could find a proper job that related to my major. As you can see, we need to learn knowledge in universities despite participating in sports and social activities.
Secondly, concentrating on their major makes students more professional. If the universities had more sports and social activities, students would concentrate on unnecessary matters leading to make unprofessional and weak students from whom society will expect. For instance, one of my friends loved to participate in those issues. Therefore, he did not have perfect knowledge of his major. Unfortunately, after graduation, he could not find a proper job related to his major. Hence, I think universities should have a scientific atmosphere.
In sum, although some people oppose my opinion, I think universities and colleges do not need to spend more money on sports and social activities. Not only should each student learn knowledge at universities, but also they concentrate on their major to become more professional. Therefore, the authorities should spend more money to educate rather than the sports and social activities.
- It has recently been announced that a new restaurant may be built in your neighborhood. Do you support or oppose this plan? Why? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Sometimes it is better not to tell the truth. Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Sometimes it is better not to tell the truth. Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 66
- What are some important qualities of a good supervisor (boss)? Use specific details and examples to explain why these qualities are important. 73
- It has recently been announced that a new restaurant may be built in your neighborhood. Do you support or oppose this plan? Why? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, i think, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1734.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 324.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35185185185 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12694383988 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518518518519 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.636269614 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.2631578947 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0526315789 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.68421052632 5.45110844103 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135203093442 0.236089414692 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0451700413992 0.076458572812 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0409256713057 0.0737576698707 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0941611347299 0.150856017488 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0317384458521 0.0645574589148 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.