An old friendship can be described with the idiom old but gold. However, there is no shortage of debate whether it is better to have the ability to maintain old friendships or to create new bonds with strangers. In my opinion, a long lasting friendships is most valuable thing at the world. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First, old friends know you best. They know your mood, attitudes, belief system, type of woman you like and many more stuffs which you even do not know about yourself. After so many years, they are not only your friends, but also your best supporter, believer and partner in crime. This strong conncection of knowing someone so intimately is the world strongest bond. My own experience is a compelling example for this. I have very good friend and we knew each other for almost seventeen years. During my first semester at the university, I had a financial problem due to the increasing university fee and in order to maintain my study, I sold my car. My friend knew, that this car was very important for me, because this was my graduation gift from my parents. However, he bought me the car back with his own money and gave it to me back. After this moment, I was fully convinced that old friendships are the most important thing in the world.
Secondly, old friendships can improve your health. A cambrige long term study stated that a person will live longer without any major health issues if this person has people around him/her. Further they claimed, that not the amout of connections with other people is important rather the quality of this connection will lead to carefree existence.
Due to the above-mentioned ground, I firmly believe that is more important to maintain old friendship than it is to make new friendships. This is because you will not only live healthier but also will poses the most valuable thing in the world.
- TOEFL Official Guide - Practice Test 2 - Integrated Writing - Professors on TV 91
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Students, not teachers or administrators should be in control of their own education. 73
- TPO-49 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends 76
- TPO-03 - Integrated Writing Task Rembrandt is the most famous of the seventeenth-century Dutch painters. However, there are doubts whether some paintings attributed to Rembrandt were actually painted by him. One such painting is known as attributed to Rem 80
- Wilderness management has advanced greatly over the last century, due in part to such practices as the suppression of forest fires and limitations on the clear cutting of trees. Monitoring forests for small brushfires is easier with aircraft, as is the 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 243, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'friendship'?
Suggestion: friendship
...trangers. In my opinion, a long lasting friendships is most valuable thing at the world. I ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 202, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'pose'
Suggestion: pose
...l not only live healthier but also will poses the most valuable thing in the world. ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, i feel, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1589.0 1977.66487455 80% => OK
No of words: 337.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71513353116 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55043776744 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560830860534 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 618.680645161 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.8442104662 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.6315789474 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7368421053 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.89473684211 5.45110844103 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173461157073 0.236089414692 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0576277273848 0.076458572812 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0510125715407 0.0737576698707 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104117965504 0.150856017488 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0280916653246 0.0645574589148 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 58.1214874552 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.8 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 86.8835125448 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.