There has been much discussion revolving around the issue of whether the number of cars will rise or not. In my opinion, in twenty years there will be much more cars that there are today. I will explain my position providing examples to support my point of view.
First of all, I believe that there will be much more cars per family in the future. Once, I read a statistical data which were presented in one newspaper, and there was counted the number of cars per city and per family. The author asserts that the quantity of cars has raised up significantly since last century. People tend to buy cars because of the city growth and rising of the life’s velocity. People want to move fast and spend less time moving from one place to another, and it is much easier to do if you have a car. Also, I think that pollution, caused by cars, are also becoming more and more important problem. It supports the idea of increasing number of cars because pollution is going to increase too.
Secondly, It is obvious that if new roads are built or expanded in the cities, that It isn’t because of the decreasing of the number of cars. Life is brimming over with examples of how our cities are changing because of the cars. For example, recently people started to complain about a small number of the parking lots near to the house where I live. So the government made a decision to expand the number of the parking lots and make a parking place instead of the beautiful garden. I think that it is just the beginning of changes. Some people are trying to fight against increasing growth of parking lots, and some of them suggest to ride on a bicycle to work. But I suppose that rising population’s demand will cause increasing of car production in the future, no matter what.
In conclusion, I want to say that I truly support the idea that there are going to be much more cars on our roads in the future. I hope that the examples given above have sufficiently expressed my opinion.
- TPO-10 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 80
- TPO-14 - Integrated Writing Task Every year, forest fires and severe stormscause a great deal of damage to forests in the northwestern United States. One way of dealing with the aftermath of these disasters is called salvage logging, which is the practice 76
- TPO-19 - Integrated Writing Task Many consumers ignore commercial advertisements. In response, advertising companies have started using a new tactic, called “buzzing." The advertisers hire people,buzzers,who personally promote (buzz) products to people 80
- TPO-34 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone, online games, and social networking Web site.U 76
- TPO-10 - Integrated Writing Task The sea otter is a small mammal that lives in waters along the western coast of North America from California to Alaska. When some sea otter populations off the Alaskan coast started rapidly declining a few years ago, it c 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 290, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...cently people started to complain about a small number of the parking lots near to the house wher...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 632, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'suggest riding'.
Suggestion: suggest riding
...rowth of parking lots, and some of them suggest to ride on a bicycle to work. But I suppose tha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, for example, i suppose, i think, in conclusion, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1628.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 361.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.50969529086 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47549356392 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.506925207756 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.4211071156 48.9658058833 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.6842105263 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26315789474 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0722150534803 0.236089414692 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0237725968519 0.076458572812 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0240005516216 0.0737576698707 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0478994419147 0.150856017488 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0104791807481 0.0645574589148 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 11.7677419355 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.88 10.9000537634 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.25 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 86.8835125448 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.