There has been much discussion concerning what is strickly prohibited for teachers to say in a school. In my perception, professors’ views about such contraversial topics such as politics or social issues should be kept to oneself. I will explain my opinion be providing several exaples to support it.
First of all, the main school’s purpose is to teach students subject which are by the way hardly relatied to the political issues. In other words, no doubts that teachers should do their best by giving students all the knowledge they have about particular subjects. I believe that teacher’s personal opinions, even if it’s right, can possibly influence badly on the young children’s minds. Children tend to maximize their feeling and emotions or exaggarete, for example particular political situation. In addition, children are too young to be well-informed in political issues. In the lights of above, I eager to say, that teacher’s political preferences can cause some bad consequences and spoil children behavior in some ways.
Secondly, despite of the fact that we live in free countires, teachers souldn’t discuss their political view and social priorities in front of the children. An obvious example of this inappropriate behavior is when teachers start to gossip about their coulleages in front of the students. Uniquely, It can lead to the particular students’ behavior when they aren’t respectful of the other teacher. For example, There was a personal conflict between two teachers in our school and one of them behaved as it was described above; she gossiped and made rumours about other person. As expected, this teacher was fired because of her inappropriate demeanor.
To wrap up, teachers destination is to make students smarter and wiser. Likewise, teachers should be a roal model for their students and support their unique points of view. Therefore, I suppose that brouadcasting their own ideas can damage children’s young minds and be a reason why they are spoiled and musbihaved.
- TPO-13 - Integrated Writing Task Private collectors have been selling and buying fossils, the petrified remains of ancient organisms, ever since the eighteenth century. In recent years, however, the sale of fossils, particularly of dinosaurs and other lar 80
- TPO-29 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take 76
- TPO-09 - Integrated Writing Task Car manufacturers and governments have been eagerly seeking a replacement for the automobile's main source of power, the internal-combustion engine. By far the most promising alternative source of energy for cars is the hy 83
- TPO-02 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 346, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'can'.
Suggestion: can
...onal opinions, even if it's right, can possibly influence badly on the young children&a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 394, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...vior when they aren't respectful of the other teacher. For example, There w...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, likewise, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, i suppose, in addition, no doubt, such as, by the way, first of all, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1741.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 322.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40683229814 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12623726519 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.593167701863 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.4069068635 48.9658058833 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.411764706 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9411764706 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0588235294 5.45110844103 185% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191123627186 0.236089414692 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0696531863422 0.076458572812 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0485632071972 0.0737576698707 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128478247277 0.150856017488 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.036391726357 0.0645574589148 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 10.9000537634 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.